rs10895417

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):​c.12387+7G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.471 in 1,605,638 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 180,693 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.51 ( 20164 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.47 ( 160529 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002362
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.20

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
DYNC2H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Jeune syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Majewski type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Verma-Naumoff type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 11-103399879-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103399879-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 302120.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.61 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC2H1NM_001080463.2 linkc.12387+7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 85 of 89 ENST00000650373.2 NP_001073932.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1NM_001377.3 linkc.12366+7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 84 of 88 ENST00000375735.7 NP_001368.2 Q8NCM8-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC2H1ENST00000650373.2 linkc.12387+7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 85 of 89 NM_001080463.2 ENSP00000497174.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1ENST00000375735.7 linkc.12366+7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 84 of 88 1 NM_001377.3 ENSP00000364887.2 Q8NCM8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.511
AC:
77607
AN:
151962
Hom.:
20131
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.617
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.398
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.536
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.455
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.529
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.547
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.432
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.528
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.454
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.495
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.490
AC:
121112
AN:
247116
AF XY:
0.487
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.620
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.560
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.450
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.535
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.417
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.445
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.471
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.467
AC:
678353
AN:
1453558
Hom.:
160529
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.469
AC XY:
339169
AN XY:
723522
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.629
AC:
20943
AN:
33274
American (AMR)
AF:
0.552
AC:
24604
AN:
44534
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.455
AC:
11864
AN:
26052
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.564
AC:
22332
AN:
39612
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.554
AC:
47600
AN:
85874
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.414
AC:
22047
AN:
53282
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.552
AC:
3173
AN:
5746
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.450
AC:
496879
AN:
1105122
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.481
AC:
28911
AN:
60062
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16251
32503
48754
65006
81257
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
15106
30212
45318
60424
75530
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.511
AC:
77688
AN:
152080
Hom.:
20164
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.514
AC XY:
38212
AN XY:
74324
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.617
AC:
25590
AN:
41488
American (AMR)
AF:
0.537
AC:
8198
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.455
AC:
1578
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.529
AC:
2734
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.545
AC:
2631
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.432
AC:
4564
AN:
10558
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.527
AC:
155
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.454
AC:
30833
AN:
67988
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.495
AC:
1044
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2006
4012
6017
8023
10029
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
690
1380
2070
2760
3450
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.469
Hom.:
5575
Bravo
AF:
0.518
Asia WGS
AF:
0.567
AC:
1973
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.447
EpiControl
AF:
0.441

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jeune thoracic dystrophy Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Short rib-polydactyly syndrome Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
0.32
DANN
Benign
0.67
PhyloP100
-1.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000024
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0040
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10895417; hg19: chr11-103270607; COSMIC: COSV62095911; COSMIC: COSV62095911; API