rs10979605

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003640.5(ELP1):​c.1926G>A​(p.Thr642Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0785 in 1,610,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,745 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.093 ( 856 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.077 ( 4889 hom. )

Consequence

ELP1
NM_003640.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.14

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ELP1 (HGNC:5959): (elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a scaffold protein and a regulator for three different kinases involved in proinflammatory signaling. The encoded protein can bind NF-kappa-B-inducing kinase and I-kappa-B kinases through separate domains and assemble them into an active kinase complex. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dysautonomia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
ELP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary dysautonomia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health
  • Riley-Day syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 9-108901513-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-108901513-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 137575.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.14 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.146 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ELP1NM_003640.5 linkc.1926G>A p.Thr642Thr synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 37 ENST00000374647.10 NP_003631.2 O95163Q4LE38Q8N516
ELP1NM_001318360.2 linkc.1584G>A p.Thr528Thr synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 37 NP_001305289.1 O95163A0A6Q8PGW3B4E3I9
ELP1NM_001330749.2 linkc.879G>A p.Thr293Thr synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 35 NP_001317678.1 F5H2T0B3KNB2
ELP1XM_047423991.1 linkc.1926G>A p.Thr642Thr synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 25 XP_047279947.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ELP1ENST00000374647.10 linkc.1926G>A p.Thr642Thr synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 37 1 NM_003640.5 ENSP00000363779.5 O95163

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0933
AC:
14189
AN:
152022
Hom.:
860
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.149
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0329
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0612
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0256
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000962
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0510
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0975
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0506
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0808
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0823
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0715
AC:
17953
AN:
251124
AF XY:
0.0714
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.158
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0424
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000218
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0925
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0849
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0694
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0769
AC:
112226
AN:
1458744
Hom.:
4889
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0760
AC XY:
55200
AN XY:
725844
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.148
AC:
4929
AN:
33328
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0447
AC:
1997
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0292
AC:
763
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000252
AC:
10
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0537
AC:
4633
AN:
86202
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0888
AC:
4743
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0451
AC:
260
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0817
AC:
90626
AN:
1109182
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0707
AC:
4265
AN:
60308
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.427
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5264
10528
15791
21055
26319
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3276
6552
9828
13104
16380
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0933
AC:
14201
AN:
152140
Hom.:
856
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0924
AC XY:
6873
AN XY:
74360
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.149
AC:
6188
AN:
41488
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0610
AC:
931
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0256
AC:
89
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000964
AC:
5
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0508
AC:
245
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0975
AC:
1031
AN:
10574
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0476
AC:
14
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0808
AC:
5496
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0814
AC:
172
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
646
1291
1937
2582
3228
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
162
324
486
648
810
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0871
Hom.:
1433
Bravo
AF:
0.0945
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0300
AC:
103
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0791
EpiControl
AF:
0.0749

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial dysautonomia Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 10, 2017
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 07, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
0.95
DANN
Benign
0.49
PhyloP100
-3.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10979605; hg19: chr9-111663793; API