rs11052110
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001370298.3(FGD4):c.1929G>A(p.Ala643=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.29 in 1,587,558 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69,405 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A643A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001370298.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD4 | NM_001370298.3 | c.1929G>A | p.Ala643= | synonymous_variant | 12/17 | ENST00000534526.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD4 | ENST00000534526.7 | c.1929G>A | p.Ala643= | synonymous_variant | 12/17 | 5 | NM_001370298.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.265 AC: 40216AN: 151530Hom.: 5636 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.286 AC: 70080AN: 245294Hom.: 10601 AF XY: 0.299 AC XY: 39624AN XY: 132598
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.292 AC: 419752AN: 1435932Hom.: 63767 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.299 AC XY: 213396AN XY: 714854
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.265 AC: 40218AN: 151626Hom.: 5638 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.266 AC XY: 19696AN XY: 74048
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 11, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 26, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4H Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at