rs11101996
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The ENST00000429410.2(GSTM5):n.82+15737T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.445 in 152,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15,681 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.44 ( 15681 hom., cov: 33)
Consequence
GSTM5
ENST00000429410.2 intron
ENST00000429410.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.05
Publications
2 publications found
Genes affected
GSTM5 (HGNC:4637): (glutathione S-transferase mu 5) Cytosolic and membrane-bound forms of glutathione S-transferase are encoded by two distinct supergene families. At present, eight distinct classes of the soluble cytoplasmic mammalian glutathione S-transferases have been identified: alpha, kappa, mu, omega, pi, sigma, theta and zeta. This gene encodes a glutathione S-transferase that belongs to the mu class. The mu class of enzymes functions in the detoxification of electrophilic compounds, including carcinogens, therapeutic drugs, environmental toxins and products of oxidative stress, by conjugation with glutathione. The genes encoding the mu class of enzymes are organized in a gene cluster on chromosome 1p13.3 and are known to be highly polymorphic. These genetic variations can change an individual's susceptibility to carcinogens and toxins as well as affect the toxicity and efficacy of certain drugs. Diversification of these genes has occurred in regions encoding substrate-binding domains, as well as in tissue expression patterns, to accommodate an increasing number of foreign compounds. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-1.05).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.718 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.445 AC: 67569AN: 151970Hom.: 15660 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
67569
AN:
151970
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.445 AC: 67631AN: 152088Hom.: 15681 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.444 AC XY: 33009AN XY: 74342 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
67631
AN:
152088
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
33009
AN XY:
74342
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
21646
AN:
41476
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
6748
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1493
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
3825
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
2240
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
4045
AN:
10558
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
125
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
26369
AN:
67988
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
934
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1910
3820
5731
7641
9551
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
620
1240
1860
2480
3100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1911
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.