Menu
GeneBe

rs111033183

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.4589C>T(p.Ser1530Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0043 in 1,517,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 215 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S1530S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 120 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 95 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.26
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002766192).
BP6
Variant 11-77199555-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77199555-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43248.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-77199555-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0733 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4589C>T p.Ser1530Leu missense_variant 35/49 ENST00000409709.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4589C>T p.Ser1530Leu missense_variant 35/491 NM_000260.4 Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0220
AC:
3344
AN:
152216
Hom.:
119
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0755
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00566
AC:
803
AN:
141834
Hom.:
23
AF XY:
0.00461
AC XY:
344
AN XY:
74548
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0771
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00478
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000276
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000287
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00402
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00232
AC:
3172
AN:
1364808
Hom.:
95
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00207
AC XY:
1383
AN XY:
667262
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0783
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00531
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000632
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00514
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0220
AC:
3352
AN:
152334
Hom.:
120
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0214
AC XY:
1592
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0755
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0142
Alfa
AF:
0.00432
Hom.:
31
Bravo
AF:
0.0244
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0853
AC:
118
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000314
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00435
AC:
504
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00664
AC:
23
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineOct 06, 2010This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been i dentified in 3/17 (17.6%) Black probands in our lab, and as a homozygous variant in 2 individuals (Usher UMD), one of whom was homozygous for pathogenic MYO7A n onsense variant. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 28, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 03, 2014- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsFeb 15, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 22, 2023- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.34
Cadd
Benign
19
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.31
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.60
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.42
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.36
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0028
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.83
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.59
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.50
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.33
Sift
Benign
0.34
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.42
MVP
0.82
MPC
0.075
ClinPred
0.0075
T
GERP RS
2.2
Varity_R
0.050
gMVP
0.36

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033183; hg19: chr11-76910600; API