Menu
GeneBe

rs111033194

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM1BP4_Moderate

The NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.670A>C(p.Lys224Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000148 in 1,613,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. K224K) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GJB2
NM_004004.6 missense

Scores

1
5
12

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.53
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM1
In a chain Gap junction beta-2 protein (size 225) in uniprot entity CXB2_HUMAN there are 218 pathogenic changes around while only 32 benign (87%) in NM_004004.6
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.16398773).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GJB2NM_004004.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.670A>C p.Lys224Gln missense_variant 2/2 ENST00000382848.5
GJB2XM_011535049.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.670A>C p.Lys224Gln missense_variant 2/2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GJB2ENST00000382848.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.670A>C p.Lys224Gln missense_variant 2/21 NM_004004.6 P1
GJB2ENST00000382844.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.670A>C p.Lys224Gln missense_variant 1/1 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000171
AC:
26
AN:
152216
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000133
AC:
33
AN:
247742
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000126
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
134628
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000225
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000329
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000146
AC:
213
AN:
1460800
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000135
AC XY:
98
AN XY:
726704
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000155
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000397
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000171
AC:
26
AN:
152334
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000671
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000962
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000199
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000234
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000117
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000907
AC:
11
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 24, 2023Variant summary: GJB2 c.670A>C (p.Lys224Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 250298 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in GJB2 causing Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (0.00014 vs 0.025), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.670A>C has been reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with non-syndromic hearing loss, including both heterozygous individuals without a second variant identified and homozygous individuals (Tekin_2007, Ozylmaz_2019) without evidence of cosegregation with disease provided. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss. One publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Spagnol_2016), however it does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 17366579, 22567369, 12865758, 17666888, 19230829, 20381175, 23695287, 19081147, 17357124, 22016077, 10874298, 26542351, 31620696, 30245029). Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as uncertain significance. Additionally, a published expert curation also classified the variant as uncertain significance (Deafness Variation Database, Azaiez_2018). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 04, 2018The p.Lys224Gln variant in GJB2 has been previously reported in 8 individuals wi th hearing loss (Antoniadi 2000, Pandya 2003, Samanich 2007, Kokotas 2010, Shan 2010, LMM data); however a variant affecting the remaining DFNB1 allele (GJB2 a nd GJB6 genes) was not identified in any of the individuals. This variant has be en identified in 27/124038 European chromosomes and in 5/34358 Latino chromosome s by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs111033194), though, this frequency is not high enough to rule out a path ogenic role. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not pro vide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the cli nical significance of the p.Lys224Gln variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria ap plied: None. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesDec 24, 2018The GJB2 c.670A>C; p.Lys224Gln variant (rs111033194) is reported in the literature in individuals with hearing loss and in several normal-hearing controls (Antoniadi 2000, Matos 2011, Pandya 2003, Putcha 2007, Samanich 2007). This variant does not exhibit dominant inheritance (Antoniadi 2000), and, to our knowledge, it has not been reported in trans to another pathogenic variant in affected individuals (Antoniadi 2000, Pandya 2003, Putcha 2007, Samanich 2007). This variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 44765), and it is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.01% (36/279154 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The lysine at codon 224 is highly conserved, but computational analyses (SIFT, PolyPhen-2) predict that this variant is tolerated. Given the lack of clinical and functional data, the significance of the p.Lys224Gln variant is uncertain at this time. References: Antoniadi T et al. Mutation analysis of the GJB2 (connexin 26) gene by DGGE in Greek patients with sensorineural deafness. Hum Mutat. 2000;16(1):7-12. Matos TD et al. Assessing Noncoding Sequence Variants of GJB2 for Hearing Loss Association. Genet Res Int. 2011;2011:827469. Pandya A et al. Frequency and distribution of GJB2 (connexin 26) and GJB6 (connexin 30) mutations in a large North American repository of deaf probands. Genet Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;5(4):295-303. Putcha GV et al. A multicenter study of the frequency and distribution of GJB2 and GJB6 mutations in a large North American cohort. Genet Med. 2007 Jul;9(7):413-26. Samanich J et al. Mutations in GJB2, GJB6, and mitochondrial DNA are rare in African American and Caribbean Hispanic individuals with hearing impairment. Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Apr 15;143A(8):830-8. -
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 24, 2023Observed in the heterozygous state without a second variant in multiple individuals with hearing loss in the published literature (Antoniadi et al., 2000; Pandya et al., 2003; Samanich et al., 2007; Shan et al., 2010); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19230829, 17357124, 12172392, 25262649, 25388846, 26990548, 30245029, 19081147, 26542351, 20059378, 17666888, 17366579, 16125251, 22567369, 21844220, 20381175, 12865758, 31620696, 33199029, 17444514, 10874298) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 12, 2022This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 224 of the GJB2 protein (p.Lys224Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs111033194, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal recessive deafness (PMID: 17444514). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 44765). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on GJB2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMar 23, 2018- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 30, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Autosomal dominant keratitis-ichthyosis-hearing loss syndrome;C0265964:Mutilating keratoderma;C0266004:Knuckle pads, deafness AND leukonychia syndrome;C1835672:Palmoplantar keratoderma-deafness syndrome;C1844678:X-linked mixed hearing loss with perilymphatic gusher;C1865234:Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss;C2673759:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A;C2675750:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 12, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.089
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.099
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.19
Cadd
Benign
21
Dann
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.20
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.25
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.11
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.090
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.16
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.67
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.95
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.67
N;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.53
Sift
Benign
0.094
T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.15
T;T;.
Polyphen
0.037
B;B;B
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.94
MPC
0.041
ClinPred
0.049
T
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.16
gMVP
0.64

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033194; hg19: chr13-20763051; API