Menu
GeneBe

rs111033252

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.3750+9G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00325 in 1,553,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.217
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 11-77190148-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77190148-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43222.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr11-77190148-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-77190148-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0034 (4767/1401250) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0041 (4437/1081350). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.004. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 2263 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3750+9G>A intron_variant ENST00000409709.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3750+9G>A intron_variant 1 NM_000260.4 Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00190
AC:
289
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000627
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00186
AC:
293
AN:
157674
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00192
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
83854
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000936
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00361
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00250
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00340
AC:
4767
AN:
1401250
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00327
AC XY:
2263
AN XY:
691660
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000421
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000381
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00283
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00410
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00267
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00190
AC:
289
AN:
152336
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00180
AC XY:
134
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000625
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00262
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00183

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 06, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 12, 2018- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 29, 20123750+9G>A in intron 29 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.4% (31/8386) of European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs111033252) -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 16, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
Cadd
Benign
1.5
Dann
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033252; hg19: chr11-76901193; API