rs111033252

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.3750+9G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00325 in 1,553,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.217
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 11-77190148-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77190148-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43222.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr11-77190148-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-77190148-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0019 (289/152336) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00334 (227/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00298. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 134 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkc.3750+9G>A intron_variant Intron 29 of 48 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3 Q13402-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkc.3750+9G>A intron_variant Intron 29 of 48 1 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3 Q13402-1
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkc.3750+9G>A intron_variant Intron 29 of 48 1 ENSP00000392185.2 Q13402-2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkc.3717+9G>A intron_variant Intron 30 of 49 1 ENSP00000386635.2 Q13402-8
MYO7AENST00000458169.2 linkc.1293+9G>A intron_variant Intron 9 of 28 1 ENSP00000417017.2 H7C4D8
MYO7AENST00000670577.1 linkn.1590+9G>A intron_variant Intron 12 of 31 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00190
AC:
289
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000627
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00186
AC:
293
AN:
157674
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00192
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
83854
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000936
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00361
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00250
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00340
AC:
4767
AN:
1401250
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00327
AC XY:
2263
AN XY:
691660
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000421
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000381
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00283
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00410
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00267
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00190
AC:
289
AN:
152336
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00180
AC XY:
134
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000625
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00262
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00183

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Jan 21, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2021
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 06, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Nov 29, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

3750+9G>A in intron 29 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.4% (31/8386) of European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs111033252) -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Apr 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
1.5
DANN
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033252; hg19: chr11-76901193; API