rs111033279
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_153676.4(USH1C):c.225T>C(p.Asp75Asp) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00326 in 1,613,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 140 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153676.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1CInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18AInheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USH1C | NM_153676.4 | c.225T>C | p.Asp75Asp | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 27 | ENST00000005226.12 | NP_710142.1 | |
| USH1C | NM_005709.4 | c.225T>C | p.Asp75Asp | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 21 | ENST00000318024.9 | NP_005700.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USH1C | ENST00000005226.12 | c.225T>C | p.Asp75Asp | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 27 | 5 | NM_153676.4 | ENSP00000005226.7 | ||
| USH1C | ENST00000318024.9 | c.225T>C | p.Asp75Asp | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 21 | 1 | NM_005709.4 | ENSP00000317018.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00520 AC: 791AN: 152114Hom.: 21 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00796 AC: 1998AN: 250944 AF XY: 0.00699 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00306 AC: 4470AN: 1461732Hom.: 119 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00294 AC XY: 2139AN XY: 727170 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00520 AC: 792AN: 152232Hom.: 21 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00638 AC XY: 475AN XY: 74436 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Asp75Asp in exon 3 of USH1C: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a s plice junction and was identified in 5/120 (4.2%) of Black individuals (rs111033 279). -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Usher syndrome type 1C Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at