rs111033327

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.*1C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000393 in 1,611,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GJB2
NM_004004.6 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0700

Variant links:

Genes affected

GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

GJB2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).

BP6

Variant 13-20188900-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-20188900-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 44715.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr13-20188900-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GJB2	NM_004004.6 link	c.*1C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 2	ENST00000382848.5	NP_003995.2	P29033H9U1J4
GJB2	XM_011535049.3 link	c.*1C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 2		XP_011533351.1	P29033H9U1J4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GJB2	ENST00000382848 link	c.*1C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 2	1	NM_004004.6	ENSP00000372299.4		P29033
GJB2	ENST00000382844 link	c.*1C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 1			ENSP00000372295.1		P29033

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000486

AC:

AN:

152194

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000367

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000538

AC:

133

AN:

247376

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000609

AC XY:

AN XY:

134560

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000130

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000328

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000450

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000383

AC:

559

AN:

1459134

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000355

AC XY:

258

AN XY:

726018

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000897

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00217

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000387

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000365

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000486

AC:

AN:

152312

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000524

AC XY:

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00261

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000367

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.000523

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000756

EpiCase

AF:

0.000491

EpiControl

AF:

0.000711

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Jul 22, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20022641, 17666888, 22567369, 15744158, 17041943) -

Oct 27, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 31, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 21, 2019

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A

Uncertain:2Benign:1

May 19, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

May 24, 2018

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 03, 2011

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The *1C>T variant was identified in the 3?UTR of GJB2. This variant is located 1 base after the termination codon. Although, this variant has been detected in i ndividuals with hearing loss, it has never been identified with a second pathoge nic GJB2 variant (Frei 2005, Samanich 2007, Tang 2006, Rabionet unpublished). In addition, it was identified at an equal frequency (0.5%) in control chromosomes (Samanich 2007). In summary, the *1C>T variant is not expected to have clinical or pathological significance because it is not predicted to affect the transcri pt and has been found at an equal frequency in controls. -

Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss

Benign:1

Aug 31, 2020

INGEBI, INGEBI / CONICET

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Based on ACMG/AMP guidelines and Hearing Loss Expert Panel specific criteria: the filtering allele frequency of the c.*1C>T variant in GJB2 gene is 0,16% in latino population (72/35366 alleles with 95%CI) from Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/), which meets the BS1_Supporting rule. Bening computational veredict prediction from DANN and CADD predictors applying for BP4 rule. In summary, the c.*1C>T variant meets criteria to be classified likely benign (BS1_Supporting, BP4) -

GJB2-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 06, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.87

CADD

Benign

1.7

DANN

Benign

0.54

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over