rs111033351

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 1P and 7B. PP3BP4_ModerateBP6BS1

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.1910T>C(p.Ile637Thr) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000119 in 1,590,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00072 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 missense, splice_region

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.2596

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.32

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OTOF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

PP3

Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 9: BayesDel_addAF, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL, REVEL [when dbscSNV1_ADA, dbscSNV1_RF, max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.2363073).

BP6

Variant 2-26480205-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26480205-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 48180.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000722 (110/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00248 (103/41582). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00209. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 49 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOF	NM_194248.3 link	c.1910T>C	p.Ile637Thr	missense_variant, splice_region_variant	Exon 16 of 47	ENST00000272371.7	NP_919224.1	Q9HC10-1
OTOF	NM_001287489.2 link	c.1910T>C	p.Ile637Thr	missense_variant, splice_region_variant	Exon 16 of 46		NP_001274418.1	Q9HC10-5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOF	ENST00000272371.7 link	c.1910T>C	p.Ile637Thr	missense_variant, splice_region_variant	Exon 16 of 47	1	NM_194248.3	ENSP00000272371.2		Q9HC10-1
OTOF	ENST00000403946.7 link	c.1910T>C	p.Ile637Thr	missense_variant, splice_region_variant	Exon 16 of 46	5		ENSP00000385255.3		Q9HC10-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000716

AC:

109

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00246

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000188

AC:

AN:

250500

AF XY:

0.000140

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00247

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000549

AC:

AN:

1438082

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000502

AC XY:

AN XY:

716810

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00166

AC:

AN:

33054

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000134

AC:

AN:

44702

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25982

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39588

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000466

AC:

AN:

85802

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52566

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5720

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000183

AC:

AN:

1091028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000201

AC:

AN:

59640

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000722

AC:

110

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000658

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00248

AC:

103

AN:

41582

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000457

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000375

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000725

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00204

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000222

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Nov 05, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 03, 2022

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Mar 31, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Ile637Thr variant in OTOF has been previously identified by our laboratory in 4 individuals hearing loss, 3 of whom also have the p.Asp1406Asn variant of uncertain significance, suggesting that these two variants may occur in cis (on the same allele). One of those individuals was reported to have auditory neuropa thy/dys-synchrony and carried additional OTOF variants that were likely causativ e for the hearing loss. This variant has been identified in 0.2% (24/10294) of A frican chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadi nstitute.org; dbSNP rs111033351). Computational prediction tools and conservatio n analysis suggest that this variant may impact the protein, though this informa tion is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, the clinic al significance of the p.Ile637Thr variant is uncertain. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9

Uncertain:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.53

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.17

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.46

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.73

D;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.84

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.75

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.29

MetaRNN

Benign

0.24

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.76

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.4

M;M

PhyloP100

9.3

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.72

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.4

D;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.88

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0010

D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.

Vest4

0.94

MVP

0.97

MPC

0.73

ClinPred

0.17

GERP RS

4.4

Varity_R

0.84

gMVP

0.86

Mutation Taster

=42/58

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.26

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.67

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over