rs111033445

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.5565C>T(p.Ala1855Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00273 in 1,613,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

PCDH15
NM_033056.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.279

Variant links:

Genes affected

PCDH15 (HGNC:14674): (protocadherin related 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. Mutations in this gene result in hearing loss and Usher Syndrome Type IF (USH1F). Extensive alternative splicing resulting in multiple isoforms has been observed in the mouse ortholog. Similar alternatively spliced transcripts are inferred to occur in human, and additional variants are likely to occur. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

PCDH15 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).

BP6

Variant 10-53822161-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-53822161-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46503.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr10-53822161-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-53822161-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.279 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PCDH15	NM_033056.4 link	c.5565C>T	p.Ala1855Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 33 of 33	ENST00000320301.11	NP_149045.3	Q96QU1-1
PCDH15	NM_001384140.1 link	c.4368-1931C>T		intron_variant	Intron 32 of 37	ENST00000644397.2	NP_001371069.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PCDH15	ENST00000320301.11 link	c.5565C>T	p.Ala1855Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 33 of 33	1	NM_033056.4	ENSP00000322604.6		Q96QU1-1
PCDH15	ENST00000644397.2 link	c.4368-1931C>T		intron_variant	Intron 32 of 37		NM_001384140.1	ENSP00000495195.1		A0A2R8Y6C0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00161

AC:

244

AN:

152002

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000507

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000378

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00276

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00240

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00177

AC:

445

AN:

251382

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00172

AC XY:

233

AN XY:

135844

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000751

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000785

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00306

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00285

AC:

4165

AN:

1461814

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00281

AC XY:

2044

AN XY:

727204

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000329

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000754

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000880

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00347

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00217

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00160

AC:

244

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00143

AC XY:

106

AN XY:

74356

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000506

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000378

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00276

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00238

Alfa

AF:

0.00253

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00169

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00284

EpiControl

AF:

0.00261

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Mar 14, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2021

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 30, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:4

Nov 21, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 04, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ala1855Ala in exon 33 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located ne ar a splice junction and has been identified in 0.3% (381/126618) European chro mosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs111033445). -

Jun 26, 2019

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1F

Benign:1

Oct 23, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.74

CADD

Benign

4.1

DANN

Benign

0.44

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over