rs111033461

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):​c.2337G>A​(p.Lys779=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00112 in 1,613,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0061 ( 9 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00060 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 10-71695465-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71695465-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 45895.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr10-71695465-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.08 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0061 (929/152322) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0214 (889/41574). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0202. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 420 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AD,AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2337G>A p.Lys779= synonymous_variant 22/70 ENST00000224721.12 NP_071407.4
CDH23NM_001171930.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2337G>A p.Lys779= synonymous_variant 22/32 NP_001165401.1
CDH23NM_001171931.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2337G>A p.Lys779= synonymous_variant 22/26 NP_001165402.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.2337G>A p.Lys779= synonymous_variant 22/705 NM_022124.6 ENSP00000224721 P1Q9H251-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00608
AC:
926
AN:
152204
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0214
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00163
AC:
407
AN:
249268
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00124
AC XY:
168
AN XY:
135240
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0226
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00133
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000531
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000661
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000604
AC:
883
AN:
1461284
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.000505
AC XY:
367
AN XY:
726940
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0205
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000396
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00126
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00610
AC:
929
AN:
152322
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00564
AC XY:
420
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0214
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00355
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00753
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 30, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 12, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
CDH23-related disorder Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 10, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineOct 24, 2011Lys779Lys in exon 22 of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction and has been identified in 1.1% (14/1273) of chromosomes from a broad population (dbSNP rs111033461). -
Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Oct 21, 2019- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Benign
6.1
DANN
Benign
0.48

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033461; hg19: chr10-73455222; API