rs111033693
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 17 ACMG points: 17P and 0B. PM1PM5PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000155.4(GALT):c.442C>T(p.Arg148Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000322 in 1,461,890 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R148Q) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000155.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- classic galactosemiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- galactosemiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 17 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000155.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GALT | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.442C>T | p.Arg148Trp | missense | Exon 5 of 11 | ENSP00000368119.4 | P07902-1 | ||
| ENSG00000258728 | TSL:5 | c.253-219C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000451792.1 | G3V4G9 | |||
| GALT | c.481C>T | p.Arg161Trp | missense | Exon 4 of 10 | ENSP00000572399.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000278 AC: 7AN: 251494 AF XY: 0.0000441 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000322 AC: 47AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000440 AC XY: 32AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at