rs111033764
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM1PM2PP2PP3
The NM_000155.4(GALT):c.793C>G(p.Pro265Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000226 in 1,460,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P265P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000155.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- classic galactosemiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- galactosemiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000155.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GALT | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.793C>G | p.Pro265Ala | missense | Exon 8 of 11 | ENSP00000368119.4 | P07902-1 | ||
| ENSG00000258728 | TSL:5 | c.432+411C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000451792.1 | G3V4G9 | |||
| GALT | c.832C>G | p.Pro278Ala | missense | Exon 7 of 10 | ENSP00000572399.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250752 AF XY: 0.00000737 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000226 AC: 33AN: 1460986Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 726858 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at