rs111352454

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001318054.2(HRAS):c.38C>T(p.Thr13Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00197 in 1,613,866 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

HRAS
NM_001318054.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.12

Variant links:

Genes affected

HRAS (HGNC:5173): (HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase) This gene belongs to the Ras oncogene family, whose members are related to the transforming genes of mammalian sarcoma retroviruses. The products encoded by these genes function in signal transduction pathways. These proteins can bind GTP and GDP, and they have intrinsic GTPase activity. This protein undergoes a continuous cycle of de- and re-palmitoylation, which regulates its rapid exchange between the plasma membrane and the Golgi apparatus. Mutations in this gene cause Costello syndrome, a disease characterized by increased growth at the prenatal stage, growth deficiency at the postnatal stage, predisposition to tumor formation, cognitive disability, skin and musculoskeletal abnormalities, distinctive facial appearance and cardiovascular abnormalities. Defects in this gene are implicated in a variety of cancers, including bladder cancer, follicular thyroid cancer, and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Multiple transcript variants, which encode different isoforms, have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

HRAS links:

LRRC56 (HGNC:25430): (leucine rich repeat containing 56) Predicted to be involved in cell projection organization. Predicted to be located in cilium. Implicated in primary ciliary dyskinesia 39. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

LRRC56 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).

BP6

Variant 11-533546-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-533546-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 40441.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr11-533546-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr11-533546-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00121 (184/152320) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00222 (34/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00163. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 82 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 184 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HRAS	NM_005343.4 link	c.357C>T	p.Asp119Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 6	ENST00000311189.8	NP_005334.1	P01112-1X5D945
HRAS	NM_176795.5 link	c.357C>T	p.Asp119Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 6	ENST00000417302.7	NP_789765.1	P01112-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
HRAS	ENST00000311189.8 link	c.357C>T	p.Asp119Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 6	1	NM_005343.4	ENSP00000309845.7		P01112-1
HRAS	ENST00000417302.7 link	c.357C>T	p.Asp119Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 6	5	NM_176795.5	ENSP00000388246.1		P01112-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00121

AC:

184

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000410

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00223

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000576

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00105

AC:

263

AN:

251364

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00107

AC XY:

145

AN XY:

135910

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000493

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000636

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00205

AC:

2995

AN:

1461546

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00206

AC XY:

1501

AN XY:

727092

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000388

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000559

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00153

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00245

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00290

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00121

AC:

184

AN:

152320

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00110

AC XY:

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000409

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00222

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000576

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.00159

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00120

EpiCase

AF:

0.00256

EpiControl

AF:

0.00202

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

HRAS: BP4, BP7 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Aug 18, 2011

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Asp119Asp in exon 4 of HRAS: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it has been identified in 8/214(3.7%) chromosomes (rs111352454). In addition, this variant does not alter an amino acid residue and is not loca ted near a splice junction. Furthermore, this variant has previously been identi fied in our laboratory in an individual with a de novo variant in BRAF and in an unaffected parent of that individual. -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 16, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Costello syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 24, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Nov 19, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Malignant tumor of urinary bladder;C0334082:Epidermal nevus;C0587248:Costello syndrome;C1842036:Large congenital melanocytic nevus;C4225426:Thyroid cancer, nonmedullary, 2;C4552097:Linear nevus sebaceous syndrome

Benign:1

Jul 26, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

RASopathy

Benign:1

Apr 18, 2017

ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.357C>T (p.Asp119=) variant in the HRAS gene is 0.129% (102/66416) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) -

HRAS-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 01, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome

Benign:1

Jul 01, 2020

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

6.4

DANN

Benign

0.93

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over