rs111381107
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000426.4(LAMA2):c.1701C>T(p.Ile567=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0061 ( 12 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00086 ( 14 hom. )
Consequence
LAMA2
NM_000426.4 synonymous
NM_000426.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.248
Genes affected
LAMA2 (HGNC:6482): (laminin subunit alpha 2) Laminin, an extracellular protein, is a major component of the basement membrane. It is thought to mediate the attachment, migration, and organization of cells into tissues during embryonic development by interacting with other extracellular matrix components. It is composed of three subunits, alpha, beta, and gamma, which are bound to each other by disulfide bonds into a cross-shaped molecule. This gene encodes the alpha 2 chain, which constitutes one of the subunits of laminin 2 (merosin) and laminin 4 (s-merosin). Mutations in this gene have been identified as the cause of congenital merosin-deficient muscular dystrophy. Two transcript variants encoding different proteins have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
?
Variant 6-129192772-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-129192772-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 193991.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-129192772-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.248 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00607 (925/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0203 (844/41566). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0192. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 476 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 11 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA2 | NM_000426.4 | c.1701C>T | p.Ile567= | synonymous_variant | 12/65 | ENST00000421865.3 | |
LAMA2 | NM_001079823.2 | c.1701C>T | p.Ile567= | synonymous_variant | 12/64 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA2 | ENST00000421865.3 | c.1701C>T | p.Ile567= | synonymous_variant | 12/65 | 5 | NM_000426.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00595 AC: 906AN: 152176Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
906
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00174 AC: 437AN: 251468Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00132 AC XY: 179AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
437
AN:
251468
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
179
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000862 AC: 1260AN: 1461880Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000820 AC XY: 596AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1260
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
596
AN XY:
727242
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00607 AC: 925AN: 152294Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00639 AC XY: 476AN XY: 74472
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
925
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
476
AN XY:
74472
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
44
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 13, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 15, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Congenital muscular dystrophy due to partial LAMA2 deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at