Menu
GeneBe

rs111558968

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):c.5779C>T(p.Leu1927Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000659 in 1,613,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.43
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004175842).
BP6
Variant 2-166198860-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166198860-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 196020.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-166198860-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0029 (442/152222) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00963 (400/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00885. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 190 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 4 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.5779C>T p.Leu1927Phe missense_variant 27/27 ENST00000642356.2
SCN1A-AS1NR_110260.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.432-779G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.5779C>T p.Leu1927Phe missense_variant 27/27 NM_001365536.1 P1Q15858-1
SCN1A-AS1ENST00000651574.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1110-779G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00289
AC:
439
AN:
152104
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00959
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000766
AC:
191
AN:
249406
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000547
AC XY:
74
AN XY:
135282
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00962
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000667
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000826
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000426
AC:
622
AN:
1461526
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000385
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
727052
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000761
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000881
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00142
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00290
AC:
442
AN:
152222
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00255
AC XY:
190
AN XY:
74412
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00963
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.000775
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00332
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00802
AC:
31
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000984
AC:
119
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 23, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2022SCN9A: BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 14, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJan 12, 2017- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 12, 2015- -
Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Inherited Erythromelalgia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.085
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.30
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
Cadd
Benign
17
Dann
Benign
0.95
Eigen
Benign
-0.35
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.57
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.24
T;.;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0042
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.39
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Benign
0.59
T;T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.71
T;T;.;.;.;T
Vest4
0.054
MVP
0.54
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
4.2
Varity_R
0.074
gMVP
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111558968; hg19: chr2-167055370; API