rs111558968

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):​c.5779C>T​(p.Leu1927Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000659 in 1,613,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.43

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004175842).
BP6
Variant 2-166198860-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166198860-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 196020.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0029 (442/152222) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00963 (400/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00885. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 190 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,SD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkc.5779C>T p.Leu1927Phe missense_variant Exon 27 of 27 ENST00000642356.2 NP_001352465.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkc.5779C>T p.Leu1927Phe missense_variant Exon 27 of 27 NM_001365536.1 ENSP00000495601.1 Q15858-1
SCN9AENST00000303354.11 linkc.5779C>T p.Leu1927Phe missense_variant Exon 27 of 27 5 ENSP00000304748.7 Q15858-1
SCN9AENST00000409672.5 linkc.5746C>T p.Leu1916Phe missense_variant Exon 27 of 27 5 ENSP00000386306.1 Q15858-3
SCN9AENST00000645907.1 linkc.5746C>T p.Leu1916Phe missense_variant Exon 27 of 27 ENSP00000495983.1 Q15858-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00289
AC:
439
AN:
152104
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00959
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000766
AC:
191
AN:
249406
AF XY:
0.000547
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00962
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000667
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000826
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000426
AC:
622
AN:
1461526
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000385
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
727052
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0115
AC:
384
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000761
AC:
34
AN:
44702
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
3
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53384
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00295
AC:
17
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000881
AC:
98
AN:
1111754
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
86
AN:
60366
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
39
78
118
157
196
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00290
AC:
442
AN:
152222
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00255
AC XY:
190
AN XY:
74412
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00963
AC:
400
AN:
41526
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
18
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000279
AC:
19
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
5
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00128
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00332
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00802
AC:
31
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000984
AC:
119
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
Apr 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SCN9A: BS2 -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jan 12, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 14, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 23, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
May 12, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Inherited Erythromelalgia Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.085
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.30
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.26
.;T;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.35
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.57
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.24
T;.;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0042
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.39
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.6
.;L;.;.;L;L
PhyloP100
2.4
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Benign
0.59
T;T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.71
T;T;.;.;.;T
Vest4
0.054
MVP
0.54
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
4.2
Varity_R
0.074
gMVP
0.21
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111558968; hg19: chr2-167055370; API