rs111586634

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_018076.5(ODAD2):c.2127C>T(p.Leu709Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000609 in 1,611,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

ODAD2
NM_018076.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.188

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ODAD2 (HGNC:25583): (outer dynein arm docking complex subunit 2) The protein encoded by this gene contains ten Armadillo repeat motifs (ARMs) and one HEAT repeat, and is thought to be involved in ciliary and flagellar movement. This protein has been shown to localize to the ciliary axonemes and at the ciliary base of respiratory cells. Studies indicate that mutations in this gene cause partial outer dynein arm (ODA) defects in respiratory cilia. The cilia of cells with mutations in this gene displayed either reduced ciliary beat frequency and amplitude, or, complete immotility. Some individuals with primary ciliary dyskensia (PCD) have been shown to have mutations in this gene. PCD is characterized by chronic airway disease and left/right body asymmetry defects. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2015]

ODAD2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

primary ciliary dyskinesia 23
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
primary ciliary dyskinesia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ODAD2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).

BP6

Variant 10-27936851-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-27936851-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 417173.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.188 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00301 (458/152212) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0104 (432/41532). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00959. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 216 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ODAD2	NM_018076.5 link	c.2127C>T	p.Leu709Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 20	ENST00000305242.10	NP_060546.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ODAD2	ENST00000305242.10 link	c.2127C>T	p.Leu709Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 20	1	NM_018076.5	ENSP00000306410.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00295

AC:

449

AN:

152094

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0102

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000918

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000878

AC:

218

AN:

248362

AF XY:

0.000544

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0126

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000324

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000888

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000331

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000358

AC:

523

AN:

1459786

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000291

AC XY:

211

AN XY:

726060

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0129

AC:

432

AN:

33374

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000700

AC:

AN:

44278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26060

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39628

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000234

AC:

AN:

85650

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5760

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000540

AC:

AN:

1111328

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000862

AC:

AN:

60304

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.482

Heterozygous variant carriers

102

128

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00301

AC:

458

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00290

AC XY:

216

AN XY:

74400

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0104

AC:

432

AN:

41532

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000916

AC:

AN:

15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000208

AC:

AN:

4816

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10602

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000735

AC:

AN:

68012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

100

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00145

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00350

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3476

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000546

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:1

Jan 17, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 23

Benign:1

Jan 14, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

ODAD2-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 07, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Benign

6.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

-0.19

Mutation Taster

=94/6

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over