rs111624565

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_020631.6(PLEKHG5):c.918C>T(p.Asp306Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,613,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00091 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

PLEKHG5
NM_020631.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.441

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PLEKHG5 (HGNC:29105): (pleckstrin homology and RhoGEF domain containing G5) This gene encodes a protein that activates the nuclear factor kappa B (NFKB1) signaling pathway. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

PLEKHG5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

neuromuscular disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease recessive intermediate C
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal recessive 4
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

PLEKHG5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).

BP6

Variant 1-6473052-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-6473052-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 297962.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.441 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000906 (138/152290) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0014 (95/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00117. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 55 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PLEKHG5	NM_020631.6 link	c.918C>T	p.Asp306Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 21	ENST00000377728.8	NP_065682.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PLEKHG5	ENST00000377728.8 link	c.918C>T	p.Asp306Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 21	2	NM_020631.6	ENSP00000366957.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000907

AC:

138

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000675

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000828

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00140

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00100

AC:

251

AN:

250338

AF XY:

0.00108

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000802

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000608

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000277

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00163

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000817

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00127

AC:

1856

AN:

1461612

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00129

AC XY:

941

AN XY:

727094

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000239

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000514

AC:

AN:

44714

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000545

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000169

AC:

AN:

53290

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000693

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00153

AC:

1702

AN:

1111880

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.462

Heterozygous variant carriers

117

234

351

468

585

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

180

240

300

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000906

AC:

138

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000739

AC XY:

AN XY:

74460

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000673

AC:

AN:

41578

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000261

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5158

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000829

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000189

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00140

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00237

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00154

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000982

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00153

EpiControl

AF:

0.00107

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Sep 14, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 18, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Aug 24, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

PLEKHG5: BP4, BP7 -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal recessive 4

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal recessive 4;C3809309:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease recessive intermediate C

Benign:1

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PLEKHG5-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 19, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.71

CADD

Benign

0.13

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.67

PhyloP100

-0.44

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over