rs112034360
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The ENST00000613296.6(ALMS1):āc.3894A>Gā(p.Gln1298=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.053 in 1,612,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,615 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.058 ( 305 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.052 ( 2310 hom. )
Consequence
ALMS1
ENST00000613296.6 synonymous
ENST00000613296.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.36
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 2-73450421-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73450421-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 383756.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.36 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0727 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | NM_001378454.1 | c.3894A>G | p.Gln1298= | synonymous_variant | 8/23 | ENST00000613296.6 | NP_001365383.1 | |
ALMS1 | NM_015120.4 | c.3897A>G | p.Gln1299= | synonymous_variant | 8/23 | NP_055935.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | ENST00000613296.6 | c.3894A>G | p.Gln1298= | synonymous_variant | 8/23 | 1 | NM_001378454.1 | ENSP00000482968 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0582 AC: 8796AN: 151030Hom.: 305 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
8796
AN:
151030
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0453 AC: 11284AN: 249262Hom.: 374 AF XY: 0.0436 AC XY: 5901AN XY: 135216
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
11284
AN:
249262
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5901
AN XY:
135216
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0525 AC: 76674AN: 1461780Hom.: 2310 Cov.: 40 AF XY: 0.0512 AC XY: 37217AN XY: 727192
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
76674
AN:
1461780
Hom.:
Cov.:
40
AF XY:
AC XY:
37217
AN XY:
727192
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0582 AC: 8796AN: 151146Hom.: 305 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0579 AC XY: 4277AN XY: 73844
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
8796
AN:
151146
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4277
AN XY:
73844
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
35
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 21, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 27, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 21, 2016 | p.Gln1297Gln in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 7.82% (517/6614) of Finnish chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broa dinstitute.org; dbSNP rs112034360). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Alstrom syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at