Menu
GeneBe

rs112114400

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_178452.6(DNAAF1):​c.1496C>T​(p.Pro499Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000457 in 1,611,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P499T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF1
NM_178452.6 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.190
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAAF1 (HGNC:30539): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is cilium-specific and is required for the stability of the ciliary architecture. It is involved in the regulation of microtubule-based cilia and actin-based brush border microvilli. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia-13. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004019946).
BP6
Variant 16-84170324-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-84170324-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 262941.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00245 (373/152296) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00863 (359/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0079. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 168 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAAF1NM_178452.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1496C>T p.Pro499Leu missense_variant 8/12 ENST00000378553.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAAF1ENST00000378553.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1496C>T p.Pro499Leu missense_variant 8/121 NM_178452.6 P1Q8NEP3-1
DNAAF1ENST00000563818.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.1173C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 4/82
DNAAF1ENST00000570298.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.1650C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 8/112
DNAAF1ENST00000563093.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*51C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 9/112 Q8NEP3-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00242
AC:
369
AN:
152178
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00856
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000524
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000594
AC:
148
AN:
248978
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000333
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
135132
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00900
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000892
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000328
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000249
AC:
363
AN:
1459588
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
93
AF XY:
0.000205
AC XY:
149
AN XY:
726192
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00864
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000204
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000990
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000863
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00245
AC:
373
AN:
152296
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00226
AC XY:
168
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00863
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00111
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00268
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0100
AC:
44
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000751
AC:
91

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 30, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 08, 2024- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 13 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.072
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.61
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
0.68
DANN
Benign
0.24
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0056
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0064
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.41
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0040
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.60
N
REVEL
Benign
0.021
Sift
Benign
1.0
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T
Polyphen
0.11
B
Vest4
0.28
MVP
0.055
MPC
0.021
ClinPred
0.0030
T
GERP RS
-0.49
Varity_R
0.021
gMVP
0.065

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs112114400; hg19: chr16-84203930; API