rs11225584

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):​c.6420T>C​(p.Asn2140Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.116 in 1,595,920 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11,614 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.11 ( 1019 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 10595 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.330

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
DYNC2H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Jeune syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Majewski type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Verma-Naumoff type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 11-103181829-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103181829-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 302054.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.204 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC2H1NM_001080463.2 linkc.6420T>C p.Asn2140Asn synonymous_variant Exon 40 of 90 ENST00000650373.2 NP_001073932.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1NM_001377.3 linkc.6420T>C p.Asn2140Asn synonymous_variant Exon 40 of 89 ENST00000375735.7 NP_001368.2 Q8NCM8-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC2H1ENST00000650373.2 linkc.6420T>C p.Asn2140Asn synonymous_variant Exon 40 of 90 NM_001080463.2 ENSP00000497174.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1ENST00000375735.7 linkc.6420T>C p.Asn2140Asn synonymous_variant Exon 40 of 89 1 NM_001377.3 ENSP00000364887.2 Q8NCM8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.108
AC:
16337
AN:
151578
Hom.:
1016
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0766
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.230
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0829
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.109
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.215
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.170
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.134
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0538
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.114
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.105
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.115
AC:
26097
AN:
226062
AF XY:
0.119
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0784
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0542
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.217
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.132
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.110
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.113
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.117
AC:
169540
AN:
1444224
Hom.:
10595
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.119
AC XY:
85352
AN XY:
717004
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0742
AC:
2452
AN:
33060
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0575
AC:
2463
AN:
42842
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.110
AC:
2837
AN:
25750
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.217
AC:
8481
AN:
39036
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.160
AC:
13364
AN:
83598
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.133
AC:
6997
AN:
52550
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0678
AC:
385
AN:
5676
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.114
AC:
125616
AN:
1102144
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.117
AC:
6945
AN:
59568
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7512
15024
22535
30047
37559
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4690
9380
14070
18760
23450
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.108
AC:
16359
AN:
151696
Hom.:
1019
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.109
AC XY:
8093
AN XY:
74130
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0770
AC:
3196
AN:
41498
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0826
AC:
1255
AN:
15188
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.109
AC:
379
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.214
AC:
1110
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.170
AC:
819
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.134
AC:
1416
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0578
AC:
17
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.114
AC:
7742
AN:
67674
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.103
AC:
216
AN:
2100
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
736
1472
2209
2945
3681
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
190
380
570
760
950
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.111
Hom.:
3027
Bravo
AF:
0.101
Asia WGS
AF:
0.165
AC:
575
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Apr 22, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jeune thoracic dystrophy Benign:2
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
3.8
DANN
Benign
0.46
PhyloP100
0.33
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11225584; hg19: chr11-103052558; COSMIC: COSV62094382; API