rs11228414

Positions:

• chr11-68936802-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The ENST00000255078.8(IGHMBP2):​c.2322A>G​(p.Glu774=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000685 in 1,613,976 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 (1 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00064 (26 hom.)
• Consequence: IGHMBP2 ENST00000255078.8 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0650

Genes affected

IGHMBP2 (HGNC:5542): (immunoglobulin mu DNA binding protein 2) This gene encodes a helicase superfamily member that binds a specific DNA sequence from the immunoglobulin mu chain switch region. Mutations in this gene lead to spinal muscle atrophy with respiratory distress type 1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
• BP6: Variant 11-68936802-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-68936802-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 305852.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-68936802-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.065 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00115 (175/152334) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0315 (163/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0275. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 104 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 26 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
IGHMBP2	NM_002180.3	c.2322A>G	p.Glu774=	synonymous_variant	13/15	ENST00000255078.8	NP_002171.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
IGHMBP2	ENST00000255078.8	c.2322A>G	p.Glu774=	synonymous_variant	13/15	1	NM_002180.3	ENSP00000255078	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00116 AC: 177 AN: 152216 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.0318

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00145

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000955

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00280 AC: 704 AN: 251030 Hom.: 23 AF XY: 0.00256 AC XY: 347 AN XY: 135774

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0375

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000163

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000816

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000637 AC: 931 AN: 1461642 Hom.: 26 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000602 AC XY: 438 AN XY: 727154

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0200

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000267

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000108

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00161

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00115 AC: 175 AN: 152334 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00140 AC XY: 104 AN XY: 74494

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.0315

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00145

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000945

Alfa AF: 0.000179 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00131

Asia WGS AF: 0.00693 AC: 24 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Dec 21, 2016	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 02, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

-

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 11, 2019

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1;C4015349:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 31, 2024

- -

Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

not provided

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

-

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.56
CADD	Benign	2.0
DANN	Benign	0.75

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11228414; hg19: chr11-68704270;