Menu
GeneBe

rs11228414

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002180.3(IGHMBP2):c.2322A>G(p.Glu774=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000685 in 1,613,976 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00064 ( 26 hom. )

Consequence

IGHMBP2
NM_002180.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0650
Variant links:
Genes affected
IGHMBP2 (HGNC:5542): (immunoglobulin mu DNA binding protein 2) This gene encodes a helicase superfamily member that binds a specific DNA sequence from the immunoglobulin mu chain switch region. Mutations in this gene lead to spinal muscle atrophy with respiratory distress type 1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 11-68936802-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-68936802-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 305852.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-68936802-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.065 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00115 (175/152334) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0315 (163/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0275. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 104 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 23 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
IGHMBP2NM_002180.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2322A>G p.Glu774= synonymous_variant 13/15 ENST00000255078.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
IGHMBP2ENST00000255078.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2322A>G p.Glu774= synonymous_variant 13/151 NM_002180.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
177
AN:
152216
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00280
AC:
704
AN:
251030
Hom.:
23
AF XY:
0.00256
AC XY:
347
AN XY:
135774
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0375
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000637
AC:
931
AN:
1461642
Hom.:
26
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000602
AC XY:
438
AN XY:
727154
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0200
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000267
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000108
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00161
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00115
AC:
175
AN:
152334
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00140
AC XY:
104
AN XY:
74494
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0315
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000179
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00131
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00693
AC:
24
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 02, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsDec 21, 2016- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 11, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1;C4015349:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
Cadd
Benign
2.0
Dann
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11228414; hg19: chr11-68704270; API