rs112333674

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_198525.3(KIF7):​c.1444-4A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00394 in 1,559,788 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 220 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.020 ( 111 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 109 hom. )

Consequence

KIF7
NM_198525.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00003085
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.11

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIF7 (HGNC:30497): (kinesin family member 7) This gene encodes a cilia-associated protein belonging to the kinesin family. This protein plays a role in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway through the regulation of GLI transcription factors. It functions as a negative regulator of the SHH pathway by preventing inappropriate activation of GLI2 in the absence of ligand, and as a positive regulator by preventing the processing of GLI3 into its repressor form. Mutations in this gene have been associated with various ciliopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]
KIF7 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • acrocallosal syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • neurodevelopmental disorder
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • hydrolethalus syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • hydrolethalus syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, Al-Gazali type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 15-89647716-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89647716-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129405.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0683 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KIF7NM_198525.3 linkc.1444-4A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 18 ENST00000394412.8 NP_940927.2 Q2M1P5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KIF7ENST00000394412.8 linkc.1444-4A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 18 5 NM_198525.3 ENSP00000377934.3 Q2M1P5
KIF7ENST00000696512.1 linkc.1567-4A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 18 ENSP00000512678.1 A0A8Q3SIQ8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0203
AC:
3081
AN:
152052
Hom.:
110
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0705
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0134
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00512
AC:
865
AN:
168812
AF XY:
0.00380
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0785
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000170
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00172
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00217
AC:
3060
AN:
1407618
Hom.:
109
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00183
AC XY:
1278
AN XY:
696478
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0772
AC:
2487
AN:
32210
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00313
AC:
119
AN:
37960
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
1
AN:
25358
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
37022
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000223
AC:
18
AN:
80690
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
43368
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00508
AC:
29
AN:
5714
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000121
AC:
131
AN:
1086738
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00470
AC:
275
AN:
58558
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
164
327
491
654
818
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
78
156
234
312
390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0203
AC:
3086
AN:
152170
Hom.:
111
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0191
AC XY:
1422
AN XY:
74414
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0704
AC:
2922
AN:
41506
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00712
AC:
109
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
2
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000338
AC:
23
AN:
67994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0138
AC:
29
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
146
291
437
582
728
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0158
Hom.:
32
Bravo
AF:
0.0233
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
17
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Sep 03, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Acrocallosal syndrome Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
0.061
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
-4.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000031
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs112333674; hg19: chr15-90190947; API