rs112414325
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000719.7(CACNA1C):c.5918G>A(p.Arg1973Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0023 in 1,613,954 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R1973R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000719.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1C | NM_000719.7 | c.5918G>A | p.Arg1973Gln | missense_variant | 46/47 | ENST00000399655.6 | NP_000710.5 | |
CACNA1C | NM_001167623.2 | c.5918G>A | p.Arg1973Gln | missense_variant | 46/47 | ENST00000399603.6 | NP_001161095.1 | |
CACNA1C-AS1 | NR_045725.1 | n.333+1560C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1C | ENST00000399603.6 | c.5918G>A | p.Arg1973Gln | missense_variant | 46/47 | 5 | NM_001167623.2 | ENSP00000382512 | ||
CACNA1C | ENST00000399655.6 | c.5918G>A | p.Arg1973Gln | missense_variant | 46/47 | 1 | NM_000719.7 | ENSP00000382563 | ||
CACNA1C-AS1 | ENST00000501371.5 | n.294+1560C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00195 AC: 296AN: 152178Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00345 AC: 857AN: 248420Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00425 AC XY: 573AN XY: 134890
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00234 AC: 3418AN: 1461658Hom.: 36 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00276 AC XY: 2004AN XY: 727118
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00195 AC: 297AN: 152296Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00228 AC XY: 170AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:8
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 25, 2016 | Variant summary: CACNA1C c.5918G>A affects a conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Arg to Gln. 3/4 in-silico tools predict this variant to be benign. This variant is found in 433/121010 control chromosomes including the large and broad populations from ExAC at a frequency of 0.0035782, which is about 358 times greater than the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.00001) in this gene, suggesting this variant is benign. Five homozygotes were reported in ExAC. This variant has been reported in multiple LQTS and BrS patients without strong evidence for causality (eg. co-segregation studies). Clinical diagnostic labs have classified this variant as a VUS or likely benign before the large and diverse ExAC control cohorts were available. Taken together, this variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | CACNA1C: PM5, BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 21, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University | Dec 02, 2014 | Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. Based on the data reviewed we consider this a variant of uncertain significance. This variant is novel. Pathogenic variants in CACNA1C are associated with Timothy syndrome and Brugada syndrome. This is a semi-conservative amino acid change with a hydrophilic basic polar Arginine replaced with a hydrophilic polar Glutamine. The variant is found in a highly conserved region of the CACNA1C gene. The reporting lab observed the variant in 2 out of 353 presumably healthy individuals of mixed ethnic background. Based on these data it is currently unclear whether this variant can cause disease, however given the presence in controls for a variant in a gene thus far only associated with quite rare diseases, it seems most likely that this variant does not cause rare Mendelian disease such as long QT syndrome. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 10, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
CACNA1C-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 17, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 27, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Short QT syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | Oct 14, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at