rs1126538

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):c.1776T>C(p.His592His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00247 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 73 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 41 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 32 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.422

Variant links:

Genes affected

SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

SDHA links:

ENSG00000286001 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000286001 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).

BP6

Variant 5-251450-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-251450-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 141824.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-251450-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.422 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0126 (1926/152340) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0435 (1807/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0418. There are 41 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 955 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 41 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SDHA	NM_004168.4 link	c.1776T>C	p.His592His	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 15	ENST00000264932.11	NP_004159.2	P31040-1A0A024QZ30

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SDHA	ENST00000264932.11 link	c.1776T>C	p.His592His	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 15	1	NM_004168.4	ENSP00000264932.6	P31040-1
ENSG00000286001	ENST00000651543.1 link	n.*509T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 12 of 24			ENSP00000499215.1	A0A494C1T6
ENSG00000286001	ENST00000651543.1 link	n.*509T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 12 of 24			ENSP00000499215.1	A0A494C1T6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0126

AC:

1918

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0434

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00530

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000323

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00574

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00319

AC:

798

AN:

250444

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00229

AC XY:

310

AN XY:

135376

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0422

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00189

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00278

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00141

AC:

2066

AN:

1461610

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00120

AC XY:

871

AN XY:

727112

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0467

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00201

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000417

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00315

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0126

AC:

1926

AN:

152340

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0128

AC XY:

955

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0435

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00529

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000323

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00568

Alfa

AF:

0.00612

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0141

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 11, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 11, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Aug 07, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Leigh syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 16, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Paragangliomas 5

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.76

CADD

Benign

0.054

DANN

Benign

0.31

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over