rs1126924

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000733.4(CD3E):​c.54C>T​(p.Gly18=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.305 in 1,593,588 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 78,604 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.26 ( 6167 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.31 ( 72437 hom. )

Consequence

CD3E
NM_000733.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.413
Variant links:
Genes affected
CD3E (HGNC:1674): (CD3 epsilon subunit of T-cell receptor complex) The protein encoded by this gene is the CD3-epsilon polypeptide, which together with CD3-gamma, -delta and -zeta, and the T-cell receptor alpha/beta and gamma/delta heterodimers, forms the T-cell receptor-CD3 complex. This complex plays an important role in coupling antigen recognition to several intracellular signal-transduction pathways. The genes encoding the epsilon, gamma and delta polypeptides are located in the same cluster on chromosome 11. The epsilon polypeptide plays an essential role in T-cell development. Defects in this gene cause immunodeficiency. This gene has also been linked to a susceptibility to type I diabetes in women. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 11-118307292-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-118307292-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 302659.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-118307292-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.413 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.388 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CD3ENM_000733.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.54C>T p.Gly18= synonymous_variant 3/9 ENST00000361763.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CD3EENST00000361763.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.54C>T p.Gly18= synonymous_variant 3/91 NM_000733.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.258
AC:
39062
AN:
151688
Hom.:
6145
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0813
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.370
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.395
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.292
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.198
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.303
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.334
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.275
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.319
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.291
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.319
AC:
79570
AN:
249668
Hom.:
14145
AF XY:
0.318
AC XY:
42886
AN XY:
135012
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0723
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.513
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.297
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.189
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.306
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.334
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.318
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.324
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.310
AC:
446641
AN:
1441782
Hom.:
72437
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.310
AC XY:
222725
AN XY:
718224
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0716
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.502
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.298
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.307
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.330
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.313
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.297
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.258
AC:
39114
AN:
151806
Hom.:
6167
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.260
AC XY:
19273
AN XY:
74224
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0812
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.397
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.292
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.198
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.306
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.334
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.319
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.292
Alfa
AF:
0.305
Hom.:
7056
Bravo
AF:
0.256
Asia WGS
AF:
0.235
AC:
819
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.318
EpiControl
AF:
0.320

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUnidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría GarrahanNov 12, 2023This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 67% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 64. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Immunodeficiency 18 Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
5.2
DANN
Benign
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.14
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1126924; hg19: chr11-118178007; COSMIC: COSV62345472; COSMIC: COSV62345472; API