rs112829587
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_153252.5(BRWD3):c.769G>A(p.Val257Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000304 in 1,209,519 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. There are 92 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153252.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRWD3 | NM_153252.5 | c.769G>A | p.Val257Ile | missense_variant | 8/41 | ENST00000373275.5 | |
BRWD3 | XM_005262113.4 | c.769G>A | p.Val257Ile | missense_variant | 8/40 | ||
BRWD3 | XM_047441957.1 | c.769G>A | p.Val257Ile | missense_variant | 8/38 | ||
BRWD3 | XM_017029385.3 | c.769G>A | p.Val257Ile | missense_variant | 8/22 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRWD3 | ENST00000373275.5 | c.769G>A | p.Val257Ile | missense_variant | 8/41 | 1 | NM_153252.5 | P1 | |
BRWD3 | ENST00000478415.1 | n.981G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 8/8 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00161 AC: 180AN: 111629Hom.: 1 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00133 AC XY: 45AN XY: 33813
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000404 AC: 74AN: 183201Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000207 AC XY: 14AN XY: 67733
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000170 AC: 187AN: 1097835Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000127 AC XY: 46AN XY: 363253
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00162 AC: 181AN: 111684Hom.: 1 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00136 AC XY: 46AN XY: 33878
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 06, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 23, 2018 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | May 08, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 12, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 22, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Intellectual disability, X-linked 93 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at