Menu
GeneBe

rs112879398

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_002230.4(JUP):c.*2C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 1,578,494 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0059 ( 11 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00059 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

JUP
NM_002230.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.32
Variant links:
Genes affected
JUP (HGNC:6207): (junction plakoglobin) This gene encodes a major cytoplasmic protein which is the only known constituent common to submembranous plaques of both desmosomes and intermediate junctions. This protein forms distinct complexes with cadherins and desmosomal cadherins and is a member of the catenin family since it contains a distinct repeating amino acid motif called the armadillo repeat. Mutation in this gene has been associated with Naxos disease. Alternative splicing occurs in this gene; however, not all transcripts have been fully described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 17-41755742-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41755742-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163706.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=1}. Variant chr17-41755742-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00585 (891/152284) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0205 (850/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0193. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 445 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 10 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
JUPNM_002230.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.*2C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 14/14 ENST00000393931.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
JUPENST00000393931.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.*2C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 14/141 NM_002230.4 P1
JUPENST00000310706.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.*2C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 14/151 P1
JUPENST00000393930.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*2C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 14/155 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00577
AC:
878
AN:
152166
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00164
AC:
384
AN:
234114
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00115
AC XY:
145
AN XY:
126180
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000712
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000936
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000703
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000595
AC:
848
AN:
1426210
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000491
AC XY:
346
AN XY:
704630
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000785
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000489
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000394
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00150
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00585
AC:
891
AN:
152284
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00598
AC XY:
445
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0205
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00473
Alfa
AF:
0.00436
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00667
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 19, 2012c.*2C>T in Exon 14 of JUP: This variant is not expected to have clinical signifi cance because it has been identified in 2.1% (80/3738) of African American chrom osomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs .gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs112879398). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 21, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Naxos disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOct 12, 2016- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 02, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
Cadd
Benign
0.0070
Dann
Benign
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs112879398; hg19: chr17-39911994; API