rs112879398
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_002230.4(JUP):c.*2C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 1,578,494 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0059 ( 11 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00059 ( 10 hom. )
Consequence
JUP
NM_002230.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_002230.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.32
Genes affected
JUP (HGNC:6207): (junction plakoglobin) This gene encodes a major cytoplasmic protein which is the only known constituent common to submembranous plaques of both desmosomes and intermediate junctions. This protein forms distinct complexes with cadherins and desmosomal cadherins and is a member of the catenin family since it contains a distinct repeating amino acid motif called the armadillo repeat. Mutation in this gene has been associated with Naxos disease. Alternative splicing occurs in this gene; however, not all transcripts have been fully described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 17-41755742-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41755742-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163706.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}. Variant chr17-41755742-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00585 (891/152284) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0205 (850/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0193. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 445 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 11 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUP | NM_002230.4 | c.*2C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000393931.8 | NP_002221.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUP | ENST00000393931 | c.*2C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_002230.4 | ENSP00000377508.3 | |||
JUP | ENST00000310706 | c.*2C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/15 | 1 | ENSP00000311113.5 | ||||
JUP | ENST00000393930 | c.*2C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/15 | 5 | ENSP00000377507.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00577 AC: 878AN: 152166Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
878
AN:
152166
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00164 AC: 384AN: 234114Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00115 AC XY: 145AN XY: 126180
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
384
AN:
234114
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
145
AN XY:
126180
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000595 AC: 848AN: 1426210Hom.: 10 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000491 AC XY: 346AN XY: 704630
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
848
AN:
1426210
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
346
AN XY:
704630
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00585 AC: 891AN: 152284Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00598 AC XY: 445AN XY: 74464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
891
AN:
152284
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
445
AN XY:
74464
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 19, 2012 | c.*2C>T in Exon 14 of JUP: This variant is not expected to have clinical signifi cance because it has been identified in 2.1% (80/3738) of African American chrom osomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs .gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs112879398). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 21, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Naxos disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Oct 12, 2016 | - - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 02, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at