rs113048349
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.24208-7C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0115 in 1,567,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 141 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164508.2 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | NM_001164507.2 | c.24208-7C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000427231.7 | NP_001157979.2 | |||
NEB | NM_001164508.2 | c.24208-7C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000397345.8 | NP_001157980.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.24208-7C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||||
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.24208-7C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00890 AC: 1354AN: 152104Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0106 AC: 1899AN: 179642Hom.: 20 AF XY: 0.0110 AC XY: 1045AN XY: 94938
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0118 AC: 16686AN: 1415360Hom.: 134 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0118 AC XY: 8244AN XY: 699410
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00891 AC: 1356AN: 152222Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00891 AC XY: 663AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 31, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 24, 2014 | 24313-7C>T in intron 171 of NEB: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.3% (42/3182) of European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs113048349). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 03, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 07, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | NEB: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at