Menu
GeneBe

rs1130741

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002435.3(MPI):c.1131A>G(p.Val377=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.509 in 1,613,846 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 219,264 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.45 ( 16292 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.52 ( 202972 hom. )

Consequence

MPI
NM_002435.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.478
Variant links:
Genes affected
MPI (HGNC:7216): (mannose phosphate isomerase) Phosphomannose isomerase catalyzes the interconversion of fructose-6-phosphate and mannose-6-phosphate and plays a critical role in maintaining the supply of D-mannose derivatives, which are required for most glycosylation reactions. Mutations in the MPI gene were found in patients with carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome, type Ib. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 15-74897589-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-74897589-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 94066.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-74897589-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.478 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.534 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MPINM_002435.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1131A>G p.Val377= synonymous_variant 8/8 ENST00000352410.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MPIENST00000352410.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1131A>G p.Val377= synonymous_variant 8/81 NM_002435.3 P1P34949-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.449
AC:
68180
AN:
151932
Hom.:
16271
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.339
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.433
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.515
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.469
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.230
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.192
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.430
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.411
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.538
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.442
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.445
AC:
111822
AN:
251392
Hom.:
27095
AF XY:
0.435
AC XY:
59083
AN XY:
135872
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.332
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.520
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.462
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.220
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.432
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.539
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.473
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.515
AC:
753438
AN:
1461796
Hom.:
202972
Cov.:
55
AF XY:
0.505
AC XY:
367431
AN XY:
727218
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.331
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.523
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.468
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.245
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.208
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.438
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.561
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.483
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.449
AC:
68256
AN:
152050
Hom.:
16292
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.439
AC XY:
32586
AN XY:
74308
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.339
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.515
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.469
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.230
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.192
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.430
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.538
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.443
Alfa
AF:
0.512
Hom.:
42943
Bravo
AF:
0.458
Asia WGS
AF:
0.229
AC:
800
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.524
EpiControl
AF:
0.524

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 02, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 44% of total chromosomes in ExAC -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 10, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
MPI-congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
Cadd
Benign
7.4
Dann
Benign
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1130741; hg19: chr15-75189930; COSMIC: COSV60396702; COSMIC: COSV60396702; API