rs113275496

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):c.3525+10C>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000807 in 1,539,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0042 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00044 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

OTOG
NM_001292063.2 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0480

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

OTOG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOG links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 11-17596164-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17596164-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 226888.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00418 (637/152230) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0145 (602/41532). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0135. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 284 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOG	NM_001292063.2 link	c.3525+10C>A		intron_variant	Intron 29 of 55	ENST00000399397.6	NP_001278992.1	H9KVB3
OTOG	NM_001277269.2 link	c.3561+10C>A		intron_variant	Intron 28 of 54		NP_001264198.1	Q6ZRI0-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOG	ENST00000399397.6 link	c.3525+10C>A	intron_variant	Intron 29 of 55	5	NM_001292063.2	ENSP00000382329.2	H9KVB3
OTOG	ENST00000399391.7 link	c.3561+10C>A	intron_variant	Intron 28 of 54	5		ENSP00000382323.2	Q6ZRI0-1
OTOG	ENST00000342528.2 link	n.890+10C>A	intron_variant	Intron 6 of 21	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00418

AC:

636

AN:

152112

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000979

AC:

146

AN:

149166

AF XY:

0.000760

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0165

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000545

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000232

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000437

AC:

606

AN:

1387498

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000349

AC XY:

239

AN XY:

685120

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0137

AC:

431

AN:

31372

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00151

AC:

AN:

35684

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25140

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35666

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000633

AC:

AN:

79006

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

48174

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000528

AC:

AN:

5678

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000449

AC:

AN:

1069126

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00113

AC:

AN:

57652

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.508

Heterozygous variant carriers

126

157

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00418

AC:

637

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00382

AC XY:

284

AN XY:

74440

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0145

AC:

602

AN:

41532

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00150

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5168

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4816

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

68004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00331

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

126

158

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00307

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00470

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 24, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

3561+10C>A in intron 28 of OTOG: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus sequ ence. It has been identified in 2.6% (5/194) of Luhya (Kenyan) chromosomes from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/proj ects/SNP; dbSNP rs113275496). -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.83

PhyloP100

-0.048

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over