rs113282901

Positions:

• chr11-17394269-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_Moderate BP6 BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_000352.6(ABCC8):​c.4542C>A​(p.Ala1514=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000861 in 1,613,816 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0046 (6 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00047 (11 hom.)
• Consequence: ABCC8 NM_000352.6 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3 B:10
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.384

Genes affected

ABCC8 (HGNC:59): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 8) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein functions as a modulator of ATP-sensitive potassium channels and insulin release. Mutations in the ABCC8 gene and deficiencies in the encoded protein have been observed in patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy, an autosomal recessive disorder of unregulated and high insulin secretion. Mutations have also been associated with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II, an autosomal dominant disease of defective insulin secretion. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2020]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
• BP6: Variant 11-17394269-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17394269-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 255932.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=7, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr11-17394269-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.384 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00457 (696/152302) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0159 (659/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0149. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 336 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ABCC8	NM_000352.6	c.4542C>A	p.Ala1514=	synonymous_variant	37/39	ENST00000389817.8	NP_000343.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ABCC8	ENST00000389817.8	c.4542C>A	p.Ala1514=	synonymous_variant	37/39	1	NM_000352.6	ENSP00000374467	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00447 AC: 681 AN: 152184 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0155

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00170

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00526

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00107 AC: 268 AN: 251136 Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.000736 AC XY: 100 AN XY: 135860

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0143

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000954

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000475 AC: 694 AN: 1461514 Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000426 AC XY: 310 AN XY: 727066

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0166

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00110

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000630

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00131

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00457 AC: 696 AN: 152302 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00451 AC XY: 336 AN XY: 74458

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0159

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00170

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00520

Alfa AF: 0.00107 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00527

Asia WGS AF: 0.00318 AC: 11 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000109

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Sep 29, 2016	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Feb 04, 2020	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 10, 2023	- -

not provided Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Aug 17, 2020	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 01, 2024	- -

Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic

-

Mutations in ABCC8 gene are associated with both neonatal diabetes mellitus as well as MODY. Patients with this mutation may have a better response to sulfonylureas. However, no sufficient evidence is found to ascertain the role of this particular variant ( rs113282901) in MODY yet. -

Transitory neonatal diabetes mellitus Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic

-

Mutations in ABCC8 gene are associated with both neonatal diabetes mellitus as well as MODY. Patients with this mutation may have a better response to sulfonylureas. However, no sufficient evidence is found to ascertain the role of this particular variant (rs113282901) in neonatal diabetes yet. -

Hereditary hyperinsulinism Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Natera, Inc.

Sep 16, 2020

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Mar 30, 2022

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Diabetes mellitus, transient neonatal, 2 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.45
CADD	Benign	8.3
DANN	Benign	0.80

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113282901; hg19: chr11-17415816;