Menu
GeneBe

rs113433939

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_020745.4(AARS2):c.1196A>G(p.Asn399Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00185 in 1,614,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N399H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0099 ( 21 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

AARS2
NM_020745.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.00
Variant links:
Genes affected
AARS2 (HGNC:21022): (alanyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases play critical roles in mRNA translation by charging tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded protein is a mitochondrial enzyme that specifically aminoacylates alanyl-tRNA. Mutations in this gene are a cause of combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiency 8. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
TMEM151B (HGNC:21315): (transmembrane protein 151B) Predicted to be integral component of membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010842055).
BP6
Variant 6-44306384-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-44306384-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136228.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00993 (1512/152208) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0345 (1434/41530). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.033. There are 21 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 706 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 21 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
AARS2NM_020745.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1196A>G p.Asn399Ser missense_variant 9/22 ENST00000244571.5
AARS2XM_005249245.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.905A>G p.Asn302Ser missense_variant 7/20
POLR1CNM_001318876.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.946-135506T>C intron_variant
AARS2XR_007059282.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1220A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 9/14

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
AARS2ENST00000244571.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1196A>G p.Asn399Ser missense_variant 9/221 NM_020745.4 P1
TMEM151BENST00000438774.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.577-559T>C intron_variant 3 Q8IW70-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00994
AC:
1512
AN:
152088
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0346
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00321
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00717
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00251
AC:
632
AN:
251466
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00174
AC XY:
237
AN XY:
135902
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00100
AC:
1468
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000836
AC XY:
608
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0361
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00214
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00993
AC:
1512
AN:
152208
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00949
AC XY:
706
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0345
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00710
Alfa
AF:
0.00181
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.0111
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0334
AC:
147
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00314
AC:
381
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJan 27, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 18, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 23, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Combined oxidative phosphorylation defect type 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.056
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.65
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
Cadd
Benign
0.060
Dann
Benign
0.60
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.088
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.30
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.36
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.73
N
MutationTaster
Benign
0.99
N;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N
REVEL
Benign
0.083
Sift
Benign
0.21
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T
Polyphen
0.0010
B
Vest4
0.068
MVP
0.27
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.0062
T
GERP RS
-7.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.4
Varity_R
0.027
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113433939; hg19: chr6-44274121; API