rs113510895

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001110556.2(FLNA):c.6742C>T(p.Leu2248Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00929 in 1,209,725 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 46 homozygotes. There are 3,547 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0068 ( 2 hom., 241 hem., cov: 25)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0095 ( 44 hom. 3306 hem. )

Consequence

FLNA
NM_001110556.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.09

Variant links:

Genes affected

FLNA (HGNC:3754): (filamin A) The protein encoded by this gene is an actin-binding protein that crosslinks actin filaments and links actin filaments to membrane glycoproteins. The encoded protein is involved in remodeling the cytoskeleton to effect changes in cell shape and migration. This protein interacts with integrins, transmembrane receptor complexes, and second messengers. Defects in this gene are a cause of several syndromes, including periventricular nodular heterotopias (PVNH1, PVNH4), otopalatodigital syndromes (OPD1, OPD2), frontometaphyseal dysplasia (FMD), Melnick-Needles syndrome (MNS), and X-linked congenital idiopathic intestinal pseudoobstruction (CIIPX). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

FLNA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant X-154352208-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-154352208-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 93772.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-154352208-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00683 (773/113249) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0109 (583/53333). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0102. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 241 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 25. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FLNA	NM_001110556.2 link	c.6742C>T	p.Leu2248Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 41 of 48	ENST00000369850.10	NP_001104026.1	P21333-1Q60FE5Q6NXF2
FLNA	NM_001456.4 link	c.6718C>T	p.Leu2240Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 40 of 47		NP_001447.2	P21333-2Q60FE5Q6NXF2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FLNA	ENST00000369850.10 link	c.6742C>T	p.Leu2248Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 41 of 48	1	NM_001110556.2	ENSP00000358866.3		P21333-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00683

AC:

773

AN:

113195

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00682

AC XY:

241

AN XY:

35325

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0146

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00500

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0106

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000277

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00712

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00840

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0109

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00587

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00688

AC:

1222

AN:

177723

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00666

AC XY:

433

AN XY:

65019

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00158

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00338

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0119

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00853

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0109

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00752

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00954

AC:

10460

AN:

1096476

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00912

AC XY:

3306

AN XY:

362490

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00102

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00378

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0115

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000167

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00871

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0111

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00850

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00683

AC:

773

AN:

113249

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00681

AC XY:

241

AN XY:

35389

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00499

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0106

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000278

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00712

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0109

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00580

Alfa

AF:

0.00877

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00676

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:9

Sep 16, 2013

Claritas Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 10, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2012

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 17, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 10, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Jul 03, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 20, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Apr 09, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Melnick-Needles syndrome;C0265293:Frontometaphyseal dysplasia;C1844696:Oto-palato-digital syndrome, type II;C1848213:Heterotopia, periventricular, X-linked dominant

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.69

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over