Menu
GeneBe

rs1135363

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000061.3(BTK):c.1899C>T(p.Cys633=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.225 in 1,206,338 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32,609 homozygotes. There are 88,939 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.37 ( 8809 hom., 11848 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.21 ( 23800 hom. 77091 hem. )

Consequence

BTK
NM_000061.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.50
Variant links:
Genes affected
BTK (HGNC:1133): (Bruton tyrosine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene plays a crucial role in B-cell development. Mutations in this gene cause X-linked agammaglobulinemia type 1, which is an immunodeficiency characterized by the failure to produce mature B lymphocytes, and associated with a failure of Ig heavy chain rearrangement. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant X-101353203-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-101353203-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 254784.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-101353203-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chrX-101353203-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.8 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BTKNM_000061.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1899C>T p.Cys633= synonymous_variant 18/19 ENST00000308731.8
BTKNM_001287344.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2001C>T p.Cys667= synonymous_variant 18/19
BTKNM_001287345.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1371C>T p.Cys457= synonymous_variant 16/17

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BTKENST00000308731.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1899C>T p.Cys633= synonymous_variant 18/191 NM_000061.3 P3Q06187-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.373
AC:
41024
AN:
110014
Hom.:
8803
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.366
AC XY:
11797
AN XY:
32274
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.808
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0987
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.374
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.157
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.440
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.448
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.157
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.193
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.157
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.319
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.314
AC:
57197
AN:
182369
Hom.:
9111
AF XY:
0.288
AC XY:
19284
AN XY:
66879
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.821
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.518
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.151
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.446
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.448
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.160
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.160
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.243
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.210
AC:
230566
AN:
1096272
Hom.:
23800
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.213
AC XY:
77091
AN XY:
362110
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.828
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.501
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.469
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.435
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.158
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.249
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.373
AC:
41088
AN:
110066
Hom.:
8809
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.366
AC XY:
11848
AN XY:
32336
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.808
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.374
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.440
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.448
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.323
Alfa
AF:
0.212
Hom.:
6496
Bravo
AF:
0.415
EpiCase
AF:
0.161
EpiControl
AF:
0.151

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUnidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría GarrahanJan 24, 2024This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 53% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 50. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 14, 2020proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 28, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 11, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
X-linked agammaglobulinemia with growth hormone deficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
X-linked agammaglobulinemia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
Cadd
Benign
12
Dann
Benign
0.64
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.22
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.22
Position offset: 24

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1135363; hg19: chrX-100608191; COSMIC: COSV58117908; COSMIC: COSV58117908; API