rs113777932

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_018136.5(ASPM):c.844A>C(p.Asn282His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000591 in 1,613,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00092 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00056 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

ASPM
NM_018136.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.106

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ASPM (HGNC:19048): (assembly factor for spindle microtubules) This gene is the human ortholog of the Drosophila melanogaster 'abnormal spindle' gene (asp), which is essential for normal mitotic spindle function in embryonic neuroblasts. Studies in mouse also suggest a role of this gene in mitotic spindle regulation, with a preferential role in regulating neurogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with microcephaly primary type 5. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, May 2011]

ASPM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen

ASPM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0042510927).

BP6

Variant 1-197143408-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-197143408-T-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 157893.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000919 (140/152290) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.02 (104/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0169. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 79 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ASPM	NM_018136.5 link	c.844A>C	p.Asn282His	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 28	ENST00000367409.9	NP_060606.3	Q8IZT6-1B3KWI2
ASPM	NM_001206846.2 link	c.844A>C	p.Asn282His	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 27		NP_001193775.1	Q8IZT6-2B3KWI2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ASPM	ENST00000367409.9 link	c.844A>C	p.Asn282His	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 28	1	NM_018136.5	ENSP00000356379.4		Q8IZT6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000867

AC:

132

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000627

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0202

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00141

AC:

355

AN:

251176

AF XY:

0.00120

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000742

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0182

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000491

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000557

AC:

814

AN:

1461688

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000550

AC XY:

400

AN XY:

727160

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00134

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0178

AC:

705

AN:

39682

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1111866

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000762

AC:

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

116

175

233

291

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000919

AC:

140

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00106

AC XY:

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000842

AC:

AN:

41582

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0200

AC:

104

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67994

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000713

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000824

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00123

AC:

150

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00779

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Feb 27, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 18, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 06, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Dec 26, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

ASPM-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 20, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.079

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.55

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.030

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.77

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.88

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.14

LIST_S2

Benign

0.73

T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0043

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;L

PhyloP100

0.11

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.86

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.022

Sift

Benign

0.039

D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.079

T;T

Polyphen

0.83

P;.

Vest4

0.12

MVP

0.42

ClinPred

0.0045

GERP RS

-1.4

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

0.81

Varity_R

0.087

gMVP

0.22

Mutation Taster

=96/4

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over