rs113931414

Positions:

chr10-43109086-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_020975.6(RET):c.1119G>A(p.Ala373Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000143 in 1,613,752 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00078 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000077 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RET
NM_020975.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.86

Variant links:

Genes affected

RET (HGNC:9967): (ret proto-oncogene) This gene encodes a transmembrane receptor and member of the tyrosine protein kinase family of proteins. Binding of ligands such as GDNF (glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor) and other related proteins to the encoded receptor stimulates receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways that play a role in cell differentiation, growth, migration and survival. The encoded receptor is important in development of the nervous system, and the development of organs and tissues derived from the neural crest. This proto-oncogene can undergo oncogenic activation through both cytogenetic rearrangement and activating point mutations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hirschsprung disease and central hypoventilation syndrome and have been identified in patients with renal agenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2017]

RET links:

RET (HGNC:):

RET links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).

BP6

Variant 10-43109086-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-43109086-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 287736.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.86 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RET	NM_020975.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1119G>A	p.Ala373Ala	synonymous_variant	6/20	ENST00000355710.8	NP_066124.1	P07949-1A0A024R7T2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RET	ENST00000355710.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.1119G>A	p.Ala373Ala	synonymous_variant	6/20	5	NM_020975.6	ENSP00000347942.3		P07949-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000776

AC:

118

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00258

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000211

AC:

AN:

250914

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000169

AC XY:

AN XY:

135738

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00265

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000766

AC:

112

AN:

1461514

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000578

AC XY:

AN XY:

727062

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000629

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000447

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000775

AC:

118

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000578

AC XY:

AN XY:

74426

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00258

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.000605

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000907

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 07, 2018	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Mar 01, 2023	RET: BP4, BP7, BS1 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	Dec 20, 2017	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Mar 01, 2016	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Jan 20, 2022	- -

Renal hypodysplasia/aplasia 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

May 23, 2016

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Jul 07, 2023

- -

Pheochromocytoma

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 29, 2024

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.86

CADD

Benign

2.1

DANN

Benign

0.70

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over