rs113974315
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_133259.4(LRPPRC):āc.3595A>Gā(p.Asn1199Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00177 in 1,611,096 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0092 ( 21 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0010 ( 19 hom. )
Consequence
LRPPRC
NM_133259.4 missense
NM_133259.4 missense
Scores
3
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.59
Genes affected
LRPPRC (HGNC:15714): (leucine rich pentatricopeptide repeat containing) This gene encodes a leucine-rich protein that has multiple pentatricopeptide repeats (PPR). The precise role of this protein is unknown but studies suggest it may play a role in cytoskeletal organization, vesicular transport, or in transcriptional regulation of both nuclear and mitochondrial genes. The protein localizes primarily to mitochondria and is predicted to have an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence. Mutations in this gene are associated with the French-Canadian type of Leigh syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0055610538).
BP6
Variant 2-43899580-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-43899580-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 214594.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00919 (1400/152330) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0318 (1321/41576). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0303. There are 21 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 653 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 21 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRPPRC | NM_133259.4 | c.3595A>G | p.Asn1199Asp | missense_variant | 33/38 | ENST00000260665.12 | NP_573566.2 | |
LRPPRC | XM_006711915.3 | c.3517A>G | p.Asn1173Asp | missense_variant | 33/38 | XP_006711978.1 | ||
LRPPRC | XM_047442809.1 | c.3469A>G | p.Asn1157Asp | missense_variant | 33/38 | XP_047298765.1 | ||
LRPPRC | XR_007068563.1 | n.3637A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 33/38 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRPPRC | ENST00000260665.12 | c.3595A>G | p.Asn1199Asp | missense_variant | 33/38 | 1 | NM_133259.4 | ENSP00000260665 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00920 AC: 1400AN: 152212Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1400
AN:
152212
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00240 AC: 602AN: 251074Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00180 AC XY: 245AN XY: 135742
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
602
AN:
251074
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
245
AN XY:
135742
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000999 AC: 1458AN: 1458766Hom.: 19 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000886 AC XY: 643AN XY: 725960
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1458
AN:
1458766
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
643
AN XY:
725960
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00919 AC: 1400AN: 152330Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00877 AC XY: 653AN XY: 74494
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1400
AN:
152330
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
653
AN XY:
74494
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
112
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
357
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | May 03, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Congenital lactic acidosis, Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean type Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 09, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M
MutationTaster
Benign
N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at