Menu
GeneBe

rs113994747

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006258.4(PRKG1):c.888T>C(p.Leu296=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00346 in 1,609,342 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 171 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.019 ( 91 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 80 hom. )

Consequence

PRKG1
NM_006258.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0450
Variant links:
Genes affected
PRKG1 (HGNC:9414): (protein kinase cGMP-dependent 1) Mammals have three different isoforms of cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase (Ialpha, Ibeta, and II). These PRKG isoforms act as key mediators of the nitric oxide/cGMP signaling pathway and are important components of many signal transduction processes in diverse cell types. This PRKG1 gene on human chromosome 10 encodes the soluble Ialpha and Ibeta isoforms of PRKG by alternative transcript splicing. A separate gene on human chromosome 4, PRKG2, encodes the membrane-bound PRKG isoform II. The PRKG1 proteins play a central role in regulating cardiovascular and neuronal functions in addition to relaxing smooth muscle tone, preventing platelet aggregation, and modulating cell growth. This gene is most strongly expressed in all types of smooth muscle, platelets, cerebellar Purkinje cells, hippocampal neurons, and the lateral amygdala. Isoforms Ialpha and Ibeta have identical cGMP-binding and catalytic domains but differ in their leucine/isoleucine zipper and autoinhibitory sequences and therefore differ in their dimerization substrates and kinase enzyme activity. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 10-52062584-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-52062584-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 263893.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-52062584-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.045 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0643 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PRKG1NM_006258.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.888T>C p.Leu296= synonymous_variant 7/18 ENST00000373980.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PRKG1ENST00000373980.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.888T>C p.Leu296= synonymous_variant 7/181 NM_006258.4 Q13976-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0189
AC:
2882
AN:
152120
Hom.:
91
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0664
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00609
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0115
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00504
AC:
1248
AN:
247540
Hom.:
43
AF XY:
0.00374
AC XY:
500
AN XY:
133862
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0685
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00322
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00184
AC:
2679
AN:
1457104
Hom.:
80
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00156
AC XY:
1129
AN XY:
724968
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0668
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000117
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00401
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0190
AC:
2888
AN:
152238
Hom.:
91
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0182
AC XY:
1353
AN XY:
74440
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0664
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00601
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0114
Alfa
AF:
0.00903
Hom.:
17
Bravo
AF:
0.0220
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 21, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 23, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 8 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 28, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 03, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
Cadd
Benign
3.8
Dann
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113994747; hg19: chr10-53822344; API