rs113994747

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006258.4(PRKG1):​c.888T>C​(p.Leu296Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00346 in 1,609,342 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 171 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.019 ( 91 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 80 hom. )

Consequence

PRKG1
NM_006258.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0450

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PRKG1 (HGNC:9414): (protein kinase cGMP-dependent 1) Mammals have three different isoforms of cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase (Ialpha, Ibeta, and II). These PRKG isoforms act as key mediators of the nitric oxide/cGMP signaling pathway and are important components of many signal transduction processes in diverse cell types. This PRKG1 gene on human chromosome 10 encodes the soluble Ialpha and Ibeta isoforms of PRKG by alternative transcript splicing. A separate gene on human chromosome 4, PRKG2, encodes the membrane-bound PRKG isoform II. The PRKG1 proteins play a central role in regulating cardiovascular and neuronal functions in addition to relaxing smooth muscle tone, preventing platelet aggregation, and modulating cell growth. This gene is most strongly expressed in all types of smooth muscle, platelets, cerebellar Purkinje cells, hippocampal neurons, and the lateral amygdala. Isoforms Ialpha and Ibeta have identical cGMP-binding and catalytic domains but differ in their leucine/isoleucine zipper and autoinhibitory sequences and therefore differ in their dimerization substrates and kinase enzyme activity. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2011]
PRKG1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 8
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 10-52062584-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-52062584-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 263893.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.045 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0643 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PRKG1NM_006258.4 linkc.888T>C p.Leu296Leu synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 18 ENST00000373980.11 NP_006249.1 Q13976-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PRKG1ENST00000373980.11 linkc.888T>C p.Leu296Leu synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 18 1 NM_006258.4 ENSP00000363092.5 Q13976-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0189
AC:
2882
AN:
152120
Hom.:
91
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0664
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00609
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0115
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00504
AC:
1248
AN:
247540
AF XY:
0.00374
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0685
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00322
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00184
AC:
2679
AN:
1457104
Hom.:
80
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00156
AC XY:
1129
AN XY:
724968
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0668
AC:
2209
AN:
33074
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00346
AC:
151
AN:
43666
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25930
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39598
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000117
AC:
10
AN:
85308
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53354
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00209
AC:
12
AN:
5740
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
56
AN:
1110264
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00401
AC:
241
AN:
60170
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.467
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
109
217
326
434
543
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
68
136
204
272
340
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0190
AC:
2888
AN:
152238
Hom.:
91
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0182
AC XY:
1353
AN XY:
74440
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0664
AC:
2755
AN:
41516
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00601
AC:
92
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000221
AC:
15
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
24
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
132
265
397
530
662
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00903
Hom.:
17
Bravo
AF:
0.0220
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 23, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 8 Benign:2
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 19, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Feb 03, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
3.8
DANN
Benign
0.72
PhyloP100
-0.045
Mutation Taster
=299/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113994747; hg19: chr10-53822344; API