rs114016359

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_032444.4(SLX4):c.1755C>T(p.Pro585Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00244 in 1,584,644 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P585P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0063 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

SLX4
NM_032444.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0750

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SLX4 (HGNC:23845): (SLX4 structure-specific endonuclease subunit) This gene encodes a protein that functions as an assembly component of multiple structure-specific endonucleases. These endonuclease complexes are required for repair of specific types of DNA lesions and critical for cellular responses to replication fork failure. Mutations in this gene were found in patients with Fanconi anemia. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2016]

SLX4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Fanconi anemia complementation group P
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

SLX4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).

BP6

Variant 16-3596322-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-3596322-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 262037.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00628 (956/152328) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0177 (734/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0166. There are 9 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 457 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SLX4	NM_032444.4 link	c.1755C>T	p.Pro585Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 15	ENST00000294008.4	NP_115820.2	Q8IY92-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SLX4	ENST00000294008.4 link	c.1755C>T	p.Pro585Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 15	5	NM_032444.4	ENSP00000294008.3		Q8IY92-1
SLX4	ENST00000466154.5 link	n.2976C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 6 of 7	1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00624

AC:

950

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0175

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00425

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00372

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00172

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00813

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00279

AC:

551

AN:

197514

AF XY:

0.00264

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0164

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00352

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00169

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00181

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00430

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00203

AC:

2905

AN:

1432316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00205

AC XY:

1457

AN XY:

710034

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0175

AC:

577

AN:

33052

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00370

AC:

149

AN:

40306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00130

AC:

AN:

25426

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

38460

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00312

AC:

258

AN:

82596

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000302

AC:

AN:

49662

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0128

AC:

AN:

5530

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00146

AC:

1605

AN:

1098070

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00333

AC:

197

AN:

59214

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.456

Heterozygous variant carriers

170

340

510

680

850

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

140

210

280

350

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00628

AC:

956

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00614

AC XY:

457

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0177

AC:

734

AN:

41578

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00425

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000865

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00352

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0102

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00172

AC:

117

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00804

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

125

166

208

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000902

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00655

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Aug 31, 2012

Leiden Open Variation Database

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:curation

Curator: Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Janine Bakker. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 05, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Oct 26, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Fanconi anemia

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group P

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.85

CADD

Benign

1.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.77

PhyloP100

-0.075

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over