rs114062933

Variant names:

• chr6-42722345-T-G
• rs114062933
• NM_000322.5:c.-11A>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_000322.5(PRPH2):​c.-11A>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00582 in 1,613,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 502 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 (257 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 (245 hom.)
• Consequence: PRPH2 NM_000322.5 5_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9 O:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.133

Genes affected

PRPH2 (HGNC:9942): (peripherin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the transmembrane 4 superfamily, also known as the tetraspanin family. Most of these members are cell-surface proteins that are characterized by the presence of four hydrophobic domains. The proteins mediate signal transduction events that play a role in the regulation of cell development, activation, growth and motility. This encoded protein is a cell surface glycoprotein found in the outer segment of both rod and cone photoreceptor cells. It may function as an adhesion molecule involved in stabilization and compaction of outer segment disks or in the maintenance of the curvature of the rim. This protein is essential for disk morphogenesis. Defects in this gene are associated with both central and peripheral retinal degenerations. Some of the various phenotypically different disorders are autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, progressive macular degeneration, macular dystrophy and retinitis pigmentosa digenic. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
• BP6: Variant 6-42722345-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-42722345-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 138908.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-42722345-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.106 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PRPH2	NM_000322.5	c.-11A>C		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 3	ENST00000230381.7	NP_000313.2
PRPH2	XR_007059288.1	n.253A>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PRPH2	ENST00000230381.7	c.-11A>C		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 3	1	NM_000322.5	ENSP00000230381.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0312 AC: 4749 AN: 152108 Hom.: 256 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.108

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0115

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00633

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000338

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0258

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00809 AC: 2024 AN: 250324 Hom.: 113 AF XY: 0.00595 AC XY: 805 AN XY: 135394

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.111

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00425

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00199

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000294

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000212

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00392

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00317 AC: 4633 AN: 1460782 Hom.: 245 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00271 AC XY: 1971 AN XY: 726774

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.111

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00588

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00138

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000267

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000382

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000140

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00676

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0313 AC: 4760 AN: 152226 Hom.: 257 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0301 AC XY: 2242 AN XY: 74440

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.108

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0114

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000338

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0255

Alfa AF: 0.0199 Hom.: 53

Bravo AF: 0.0355

Asia WGS AF: 0.00664 AC: 23 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9 Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3

Apr 06, 2021

Leiden Open Variation Database

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: curation

Curator: Global Variome, with Curator vacancy. Submitter to LOVD: Manon Peeters. -

Aug 08, 2011

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Pigmentary retinal dystrophy Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Patterned macular dystrophy 1 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cone-rod dystrophy Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Choroidal dystrophy, central areolar 2 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Other:1

-

Seelig Lab, University of Washington

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: in vitro

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.81
CADD	Benign	0.79
DANN	Benign	0.62

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs114062933; hg19: chr6-42690083;