rs114084418

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001365951.3(KIF1B):​c.363+6A>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00367 in 1,612,624 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 127 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.016 ( 58 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 69 hom. )

Consequence

KIF1B
NM_001365951.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00008140
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.192

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIF1B (HGNC:16636): (kinesin family member 1B) Predicted to enable microtubule binding activity and plus-end-directed microtubule motor activity. Predicted to be involved in chemical synaptic transmission; dense core granule cytoskeletal transport; and vesicle-mediated transport. Predicted to act upstream of or within mitochondrion transport along microtubule. Predicted to be located in cytoplasmic vesicle membrane and neuron projection. Predicted to be part of kinesin complex. Predicted to be active in several cellular components, including axon; dendrite; and microtubule. Implicated in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A1; carcinoma (multiple); multiple sclerosis; neuroblastoma; and pheochromocytoma. Biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
KIF1B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • pheochromocytoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 1-10258678-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-10258678-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 291468.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0533 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KIF1BNM_001365951.3 linkc.363+6A>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 48 ENST00000676179.1 NP_001352880.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KIF1BENST00000676179.1 linkc.363+6A>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 48 NM_001365951.3 ENSP00000502065.1 O60333-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0164
AC:
2498
AN:
152192
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0553
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00707
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0348
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000911
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0110
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00502
AC:
1259
AN:
250566
AF XY:
0.00404
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0603
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00443
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000795
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00262
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00234
AC:
3419
AN:
1460314
Hom.:
69
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00211
AC XY:
1536
AN XY:
726578
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0605
AC:
2022
AN:
33442
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00514
AC:
230
AN:
44706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000651
AC:
17
AN:
26112
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39674
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000128
AC:
11
AN:
86208
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000188
AC:
1
AN:
53240
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0101
AC:
58
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000716
AC:
795
AN:
1110824
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00472
AC:
285
AN:
60340
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
154
308
461
615
769
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
84
168
252
336
420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0164
AC:
2500
AN:
152310
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0164
AC XY:
1218
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0552
AC:
2294
AN:
41552
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00699
AC:
107
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000865
AC:
3
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0374
AC:
11
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000911
AC:
62
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
23
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
130
261
391
522
652
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00792
Hom.:
23
Bravo
AF:
0.0187
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00125
EpiControl
AF:
0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 22, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
Jul 28, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neuroblastoma Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

KIF1B-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 28, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
-0.19
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000081
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs114084418; hg19: chr1-10318736; API