rs114098188
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_138796.4(SPATA17):c.863A>T(p.Asn288Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000551 in 1,608,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N288K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138796.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_138796.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPATA17 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.863A>T | p.Asn288Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 11 | ENSP00000355900.4 | Q96L03 | ||
| SPATA17 | c.863A>T | p.Asn288Ile | missense | Exon 8 of 12 | ENSP00000575823.1 | ||||
| SPATA17 | c.812A>T | p.Asn271Ile | missense | Exon 7 of 10 | ENSP00000608011.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00271 AC: 413AN: 152196Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000720 AC: 177AN: 245686 AF XY: 0.000527 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000323 AC: 470AN: 1455692Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000293 AC XY: 212AN XY: 724220 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00273 AC: 416AN: 152314Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00258 AC XY: 192AN XY: 74490 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at