rs114126795
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001384732.1(CPLANE1):c.8286C>T(p.Asp2762=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00767 in 1,614,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 89 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0057 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0079 ( 85 hom. )
Consequence
CPLANE1
NM_001384732.1 synonymous
NM_001384732.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.298
Genes affected
CPLANE1 (HGNC:25801): (ciliogenesis and planar polarity effector complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene has putative coiled-coil domains and may be a transmembrane protein. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome (JBTS). [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 5-37153827-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37153827-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 158054.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-37153827-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.298 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00575 (875/152240) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0143 (69/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0116. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 456 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 Mitochondrial gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLANE1 | NM_001384732.1 | c.8286C>T | p.Asp2762= | synonymous_variant | 42/53 | ENST00000651892.2 | NP_001371661.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLANE1 | ENST00000651892.2 | c.8286C>T | p.Asp2762= | synonymous_variant | 42/53 | NM_001384732.1 | ENSP00000498265 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00576 AC: 876AN: 152122Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
876
AN:
152122
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00636 AC: 1598AN: 251326Hom.: 20 AF XY: 0.00674 AC XY: 915AN XY: 135820
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1598
AN:
251326
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
915
AN XY:
135820
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00787 AC: 11511AN: 1461810Hom.: 85 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00787 AC XY: 5722AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
11511
AN:
1461810
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5722
AN XY:
727210
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00575 AC: 875AN: 152240Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00613 AC XY: 456AN XY: 74436
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
875
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
456
AN XY:
74436
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 09, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | CPLANE1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Joubert syndrome 17 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at