rs114137983
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.5414C>T(p.Pro1805Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000723 in 1,609,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1805P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033056.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | NM_033056.4 | c.5414C>T | p.Pro1805Leu | missense_variant | 33/33 | ENST00000320301.11 | |
PCDH15 | NM_001384140.1 | c.4368-2082C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000644397.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | ENST00000320301.11 | c.5414C>T | p.Pro1805Leu | missense_variant | 33/33 | 1 | NM_033056.4 | ||
PCDH15 | ENST00000644397.2 | c.4368-2082C>T | intron_variant | NM_001384140.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00209 AC: 317AN: 151902Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00107 AC: 255AN: 238988Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000921 AC XY: 119AN XY: 129178
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000581 AC: 847AN: 1457338Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000542 AC XY: 393AN XY: 724566
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00208 AC: 316AN: 152020Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00194 AC XY: 144AN XY: 74312
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 16, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 01, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2023 | PCDH15: BP4 - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 10, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Pro1805Leu in Exon 33 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.6% (23/3736) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs114137983). - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
PCDH15-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 21, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Dec 12, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at