rs114199361

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_021939.4(FKBP10):c.1400-4C>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00262 in 1,613,764 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 86 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 51 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 35 hom. )

Consequence

FKBP10
NM_021939.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.00009654

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.05

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FKBP10 (HGNC:18169): (FKBP prolyl isomerase 10) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase (PPIase) family. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and acts as a molecular chaperone. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been reported, but their biological validity has not been determined.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]

FKBP10 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Bruck syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
osteogenesis imperfecta type 11
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Illumina
osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
arthrogryposis-like syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Bruck syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

FKBP10 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).

BP6

Variant 17-41821650-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41821650-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261437.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0145 (2210/152242) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.051 (2120/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0492. There are 51 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1055 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 51 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FKBP10	NM_021939.4 link	c.1400-4C>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 8 of 9	ENST00000321562.9	NP_068758.3	Q96AY3-1A0A024R1W3Q8NAG5Q658U4
FKBP10	XM_011525099.4 link	c.1457-4C>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 9 of 10		XP_011523401.1
FKBP10	XM_011525100.3 link	c.1184-4C>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 8 of 9		XP_011523402.1
FKBP10	XM_047436515.1 link	c.1127-4C>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 7 of 8		XP_047292471.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FKBP10	ENST00000321562.9 link	c.1400-4C>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 8 of 9	1	NM_021939.4	ENSP00000317232.4		Q96AY3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0144

AC:

2184

AN:

152124

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0505

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00412

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00861

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00357

AC:

897

AN:

250988

AF XY:

0.00273

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0499

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00223

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000353

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000490

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00138

AC:

2013

AN:

1461522

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00122

AC XY:

886

AN XY:

727078

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0509

AC:

1702

AN:

33464

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00244

AC:

109

AN:

44716

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000696

AC:

AN:

86236

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53412

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000904

AC:

AN:

5534

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000207

AC:

AN:

1111978

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00278

AC:

168

AN:

60350

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

111

222

334

445

556

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

104

156

208

260

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0145

AC:

2210

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0142

AC XY:

1055

AN XY:

74432

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0510

AC:

2120

AN:

41552

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00412

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5150

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

AN:

68006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00852

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

102

205

307

410

512

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00386

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0164

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Dec 21, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Nov 22, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 11, 2016

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Benign:1

Jun 18, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type 11

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

1.8

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.75

PhyloP100

-1.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.000097

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0020

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over