rs1142183

Positions:

• chr16-28482632-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_Moderate BP6 BP7 BS2

The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):​c.831G>A​(p.Val277=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000752 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 (0 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00079 (2 hom.)
• Consequence: CLN3 NM_001042432.2 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2 B:10
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0410

Genes affected

CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.31).
• BP6: Variant 16-28482632-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-28482632-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136780.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr16-28482632-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-28482632-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.041 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLN3	NM_001042432.2	c.831G>A	p.Val277=	synonymous_variant	11/16	ENST00000636147.2	NP_001035897.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CLN3	ENST00000636147.2	c.831G>A	p.Val277=	synonymous_variant	11/16	1	NM_001042432.2	ENSP00000490105	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000414 AC: 63 AN: 152194 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000965

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000838

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000418 AC: 105 AN: 251416 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000427 AC XY: 58 AN XY: 135882

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.000231

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000844

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000787 AC: 1150 AN: 1461894 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000769 AC XY: 559 AN XY: 727248

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.000206

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00100

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000331

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000414 AC: 63 AN: 152194 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000484 AC XY: 36 AN XY: 74354

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000965

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000838

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.0557 Hom.: 1910

Bravo AF: 0.000434

EpiCase AF: 0.000709

EpiControl AF: 0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2 Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1 Benign:4

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Jul 01, 2024	CLN3: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Nov 24, 2015	- -

not specified Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 22, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3 Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Aug 10, 2021	- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Feb 27, 2017

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 27, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.31
CADD	Benign	7.7
DANN	Benign	0.82
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1142183; hg19: chr16-28493953; COSMIC: COSV61105852; COSMIC: COSV61105852;