Menu
GeneBe

rs1142183

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7

The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):c.831G>A(p.Val277=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000752 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00079 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CLN3
NM_001042432.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0410
Variant links:
Genes affected
CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.31).
BP6
Variant 16-28482632-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-28482632-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136780.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr16-28482632-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-28482632-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.041 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CLN3NM_001042432.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.831G>A p.Val277= synonymous_variant 11/16 ENST00000636147.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CLN3ENST00000636147.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.831G>A p.Val277= synonymous_variant 11/161 NM_001042432.2 P1Q13286-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000414
AC:
63
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000838
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000418
AC:
105
AN:
251416
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000427
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
135882
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000844
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000787
AC:
1150
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000769
AC XY:
559
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000414
AC:
63
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000484
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000838
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0557
Hom.:
1910
Bravo
AF:
0.000434
EpiCase
AF:
0.000709
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 24, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2023CLN3: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 22, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabAug 10, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 27, 2017This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 27, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
Cadd
Benign
7.7
Dann
Benign
0.82
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1142183; hg19: chr16-28493953; COSMIC: COSV61105852; COSMIC: COSV61105852; API