rs114320051
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_002529.4(NTRK1):c.612G>A(p.Ser204Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000527 in 1,558,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S204S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002529.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRK1 | NM_002529.4 | c.612G>A | p.Ser204Ser | synonymous_variant | 6/17 | ENST00000524377.7 | NP_002520.2 | |
NTRK1 | NM_001012331.2 | c.612G>A | p.Ser204Ser | synonymous_variant | 6/16 | NP_001012331.1 | ||
NTRK1 | NM_001007792.1 | c.522G>A | p.Ser174Ser | synonymous_variant | 7/17 | NP_001007793.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRK1 | ENST00000524377.7 | c.612G>A | p.Ser204Ser | synonymous_variant | 6/17 | 1 | NM_002529.4 | ENSP00000431418.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00227 AC: 345AN: 152208Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000610 AC: 101AN: 165548Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000377 AC XY: 33AN XY: 87582
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000332 AC: 467AN: 1406322Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000304 AC XY: 211AN XY: 694350
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00233 AC: 355AN: 152326Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00234 AC XY: 174AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Dec 06, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 13, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 11, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
NTRK1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 29, 2022 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2023 | NTRK1: BP4, BP7 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at