rs114334281

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000447.3(PSEN2):c.441C>T(p.Ser147Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00256 in 1,613,304 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 88 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 47 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 41 hom. )

Consequence

PSEN2
NM_000447.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.30

Variant links:

Genes affected

PSEN2 (HGNC:9509): (presenilin 2) Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with an inherited form of the disease carry mutations in the presenilin proteins (PSEN1 or PSEN2) or the amyloid precursor protein (APP). These disease-linked mutations result in increased production of the longer form of amyloid-beta (main component of amyloid deposits found in AD brains). Presenilins are postulated to regulate APP processing through their effects on gamma-secretase, an enzyme that cleaves APP. Also, it is thought that the presenilins are involved in the cleavage of the Notch receptor such that, they either directly regulate gamma-secretase activity, or themselves act are protease enzymes. Two alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms of PSEN2 have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

PSEN2 links:

ENSG00000288674 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000288674 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).

BP6

Variant 1-226885622-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-226885622-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 256183.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-226885622-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.3 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0134 (2040/152188) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0469 (1948/41500). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0452. There are 47 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 968 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 2040 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PSEN2	NM_000447.3 link	c.441C>T	p.Ser147Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 13	ENST00000366783.8	NP_000438.2	P49810-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PSEN2	ENST00000366783.8 link	c.441C>T	p.Ser147Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 13	5	NM_000447.3	ENSP00000355747.3		P49810-1
ENSG00000288674	ENST00000366779.6 link	n.441C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 6 of 32	2		ENSP00000355741.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0134

AC:

2037

AN:

152070

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0470

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00432

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00719

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00364

AC:

914

AN:

250808

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00268

AC XY:

364

AN XY:

135588

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0495

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000150

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00212

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00143

AC:

2095

AN:

1461116

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00128

AC XY:

928

AN XY:

726872

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0488

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00286

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000812

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000124

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00301

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0134

AC:

2040

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0130

AC XY:

968

AN XY:

74394

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0469

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00425

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00712

Alfa

AF:

0.00717

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0158

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Sep 21, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 11, 2022

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Alzheimer disease 4

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 07, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1V

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

7.6

DANN

Benign

0.81

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over